From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP81 and /home
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:40:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mnEat5xWJ3msGO5ck65vX7sYwWdL0VW1b5vQ1VWPQc_g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d1e608a-66e5-d026-7057-9acc227381fb@gentoo.org>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:16 PM Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> This is retarded, stop wasting my time.
>
There is nothing retarded about shared /home directories. They're
pretty common in the real world.
> >> I've already got responses from two QA members. This thread is pretty
> >> hard to miss.
> >
> > Well, then why go posting stuff like "guess we'll be triggering a
> > warning after all?"
>
> If these two things are logically connected, I don't see it.
If you're working with QA to change the QA checks, then you won't be
triggering warnings.
> >> I'm working on a patch for the install-qa-check.d check
> >> and I'm sure I'll get more when I post it.
> >
> > Are you just allowing it to not create the directory, or are we
> > considering patching it to allow creating stuff under /home? It would
> > seem that the policy would also need updating in that case, but
> > probably not the former.
>
> The patch will make an exception for acct-user packages only; for /home,
> /home/${PN}, and /home/${PN}/.keep*. In other words, it makes things
> work exactly how they did before the GLEP81 eclass started keepdir'ing
> the home directory.
IMO this isn't the right direction to go in, but we can always put it
on the council agenda. Maintaining the status quo (pre-QA-check) in
the interim isn't unreasonable, nor is keeping your package behavior
as it is for now. Obviously this issue has been around for some time.
I realize that you didn't invent it.
I guess this is the sort of thing that people will tend to disagree
on. At least Gentoo doesn't force this nonsense down my throat. :)
--
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-20 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-18 17:51 [gentoo-dev] GLEP81 and /home Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-18 18:10 ` Ulrich Mueller
2020-01-18 23:38 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 0:21 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 2:50 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 11:29 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 15:49 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 17:42 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 18:37 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:02 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 19:27 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:47 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-19 21:00 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 22:09 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-20 1:20 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-20 1:51 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-20 2:52 ` Rich Freeman
2020-01-20 3:16 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-20 3:40 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2020-01-20 3:57 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:37 ` Robin H. Johnson
2020-01-19 19:19 ` Alec Warner
2020-01-19 19:28 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-19 19:32 ` Alec Warner
2020-01-19 20:44 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-18 19:03 ` Alec Warner
2020-01-18 20:16 ` Michael Orlitzky
2020-01-18 19:08 ` Michał Górny
2020-01-18 19:44 ` Michael Orlitzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGfcS_mnEat5xWJ3msGO5ck65vX7sYwWdL0VW1b5vQ1VWPQc_g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox