From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64067-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F8A138247 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 02:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DA0AE08BD; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 02:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-f172.google.com (mail-ve0-f172.google.com [209.85.128.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463F1E07F1 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 02:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id jw12so7054708veb.17 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:38:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=S26Sq6XMvwP4liefQkDi1efWrzJrOS95SwzpP6s1T50=; b=OMsDHMui71RKq43AMTCjyZSmCiIfNrlWg4uXl7ZcvjubwrMXcEh6EQAIJB045HyYej kJaEK0s4BjlXVBlPYdC13Jpw82UllkyR+VPgowXPveJ3KG0F3TYT9rVp8DKD15TckJ5V NZoOei6vmvAZH1ZGuE1cwanYoknAlU8rVQfa8gs4QLv8IhY6+3t9VphHhAE94tF9SMNO LF2CCKI7zTwjHJbcheBPkLF5RZb89RWijgR6A1iQCjglotjPwObXccq9dlVaHDE9f4tS WPrKtMKrDATeJoZvCt++9e8fWzrizvjwVy4mz/JxzaBnnBG5PC3lt3kmOyMgPwygl9a1 jgZA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.180.227 with SMTP id dr3mr378046vec.36.1388630310362; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:38:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.112.99 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:38:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52C4CCC7.8050408@gentoo.org> References: <21188.38566.180273.751353@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <52C4C610.1000303@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_n5pW8gb3DumvVFk6RvJdyhH71V9_byR22ZrOPNBmwEbw@mail.gmail.com> <52C4CCC7.8050408@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:38:30 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VCeMAsBtDoxTmPa_v33n2bBLymY Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mmJKaxXD1VY1oBjPoUaD8XriPLhYmdxEM5DK8F3QUZug@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new global USE flag "srcdist" From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 17bf2529-6f9a-4434-99cf-cfacd51d162f X-Archives-Hash: 1532f802ffa597e13ca87622694a5638 On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Is there a real example where the license matters for something > redistributed to yourself? Well, "yourself" is a loose term. If I were to redistribute MS Windows across 300 PCs for my employer I suspect some people would have something to say about that. Heck, the RIAA wants you to re-buy music if you want to load a song on an mp3 player that you already own on CD. However, for most packages in the tree the issue is going to be how "free" as in whatever you want the package to be. If we're going to have ACCEPT_LICENSE in the first place it seems like this is just a logical extension of it. Rich