From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50706-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SCqF9-0000Rl-BD
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:36:43 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12847E0B85;
	Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:36:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9020DE07D8
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:35:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so855652bkw.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=xicEutjfOqRpExacKwX2acXhGKzZFBbTqj1/iuSWocU=;
        b=c5MOyP0ap7pRDd15jRG7/TadsruDcnl3nsFXuxVvktjL3873CHU3fg7rIwXgkorwLQ
         OG1nnNEYUR8AfCS1MyXwjgN0eDbbxbFaTYkSWDKkQF2a8Dxchyzyw9+41aQmtwXlqQRv
         BHeWP2ufOzj58FiLH32zNgV/TRr0DZoB0nkUMW8Bkg8NwWjWOMqtkhuhVyddHK/NZEwT
         ca0J4pF80pQQdcmCzY/BDkyc16pnHxs+nkMZwopc3OfGfIq4qPd8Rgdf0RIClcQGdiIZ
         fM9/ZpIBPE8LqeS4RwJ3wAeEPOMhjIGVosZ0RnTEm85XdtpW+HpS0RvgQ/qxIzNgqR4P
         qsqw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.13.72 with SMTP id b8mr11782844bka.105.1332930946616; Wed,
 28 Mar 2012 03:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.205.65.206 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1332918970.29064.144.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca>
References: <20337.28987.736877.961717@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<20120327154239.GA17394@gentoo.org>
	<1332870540.18466.9.camel@belkin4>
	<20120327191645.7b13a417@googlemail.com>
	<1332918970.29064.144.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:35:46 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a6chYuzQZE1QSXjFSrgosCi6iGg
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_miDep1oFjVefZFrARutE8=AttcW3s+vEam7t1d++qYBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for
 portage tree in handbook
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 8177e848-9c47-4824-8506-cf0f962176b1
X-Archives-Hash: c1c3a222f2f88199750d7f997580d43b

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 19:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> But that's ok, because extensive studies have shown that the only possib=
le
>> reasons for putting /usr/portage on its own partition are historical,
>> since everyone has an SSD now.
>>
>
> Yeah, right. =A0Since I must be the only one out there that doesn't yet
> have an SSD, you'll give me (and anyone else that still doesn't) one?

Woosh...