From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DE51384B4 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 033B521C005; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com (mail-io0-f196.google.com [209.85.223.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBF5E07E0 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f196.google.com with SMTP id f127so37019081ioa.0 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=HJ0pxsCQO7jFBKk5thzilYRmQYKREVf4U9XSvQmpqJ0=; b=qZPsxB0UjZU28Psri105Q/uR3rEzO+XW06/esnDm1zvt2zOhWX7oZzTQPqs5rxV282 79tUI/NElStRjSG/0+7MwwGzC9PQY7elFA4hml8ybk5mjfw5wwSl2Gs/LkS+/KR6xAQ0 9+Yha4UuqVUKqPjgTsWiXTbs1gIl64Fkt6Fd3L/Nq3HOZbBWuOdUFRNQ/6C2kn8yINHM RsDkNSqFMpXQJ7PgnMuaQgFt0rK3EvGAAKUkFwGS1yGlLl14GiM9S3BWEDcbN64bWfdD UI8ffnybBrykLTho1P/sEVS0gW+R3/BCIK5ggy4AEieONKrdeR8SwFdqUkrb5imAB9/z ousg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.46.228 with SMTP id u97mr32761556iou.136.1451929765289; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.225.228 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:49:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <568AAA13.8080006@gentoo.org> References: <5689BC34.5000006@gentoo.org> <20160104114537.392b9971@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> <20160104144036.1083a3d1.mgorny@gentoo.org> <568A8DA4.8000901@gentoo.org> <20160104154245.27599.qmail@stuge.se> <568A9592.5090401@gentoo.org> <20160104161153.30168.qmail@stuge.se> <568AA12D.7090807@gentoo.org> <568AAA13.8080006@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:49:25 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pQoUNcEZANZ3I72AMFKLcw8hPzc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP" From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: a525d667-697a-4def-b9bb-55f3454c2a97 X-Archives-Hash: adf5a9048207680f11ea7a64c0667b06 On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Brian Evans wrote: > > On 1/4/2016 11:43 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 01/04/2016 11:11 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >>> >>> So pkg_postinst for >=eselect-php-0.8.1 should say something, >>> but ideally also the invocation - but I don't know if eselect-php >>> is also code or only data managed by eselect? >> >> The pkg_postinst is already there. The eselect-php routines are >> bash code so theoretically we can do anything we want. How do >> people feel about making eselect-php spit out a warning every time >> the apache2 module is messed with? > > Perhaps grep for -DPHP5 or if -DPHP is missing in the conf.d and shout > then as part of the "eselect php set apache2 X"? > My understanding (which could be wrong) is that this update will break things even if the user never runs eselect php afterwards. I can't tell you the last time I touched the php eselect module, because major updates to php are rare. -- Rich