From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65540-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FA61387FD
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2014 00:58:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38CF3E0A9E;
	Wed,  2 Apr 2014 00:58:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C098E0964
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2014 00:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id il7so11061716vcb.32
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=eUIii52QfwGe3+jFBNk2SHBcyRa8A6lFoiz004AfQUk=;
        b=S6W33w3yr9b0Bc8TDPOYHIGparmgIyw+J4vZY0A/Lb401GLqb9q4D89jQQoSm+QrXU
         TN9hACBI/fOWrskxpNYU+qGSp3PcLWgNb1Yv9nfGatJUnvdky+sSS39LqmS7PxzPTNgP
         FapQe/cZofrIjtkQYcZ514OgAtQPVE5cP+CunQKOIXioYgc6BqCSgoXRYano7p1rTM/I
         ntebuEM+jGmHWeHojFyZNvrsFR1Mb5Xm4c4cX6P+BofFPe1Eq56cg3ks0+kb9gFiBGMq
         fMfw15Wvsvxj+3IIGlpctiWoHbqlR3BozFMZrRR2u3yjKjhe8kaTqMC0LzussluHTFIf
         Rxlg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.12.36 with SMTP id v4mr14071015vdb.20.1396400311087; Tue,
 01 Apr 2014 17:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.29.142 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <533B5620.1070105@gentoo.org>
References: <20140401001617.42fdc3bc@pomiot.lan>
	<CAB9SyzRXkymQHae=QysHhBAbCs+MMSqir9QOGc8YQ35gJQfQ5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<1396360717.20406.12.camel@rook>
	<CAGfcS_mfeyWWnQd8osyDwMj1By0dF9jaY507CMvF59iMfh=u8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<533B5620.1070105@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:58:30 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: L8zB8g_2TjbIkEVkLG2ZRaqbiJc
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_m_u95r7LRS+J9NdTGG=5gEj+VErKDpD6OmFv4hYaxR7A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 56eee1c2-3887-4f63-8277-0d22ed2b2435
X-Archives-Hash: 677a0ec8df326353631067755de686a8

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Now let's just continue to ignore the existing multilib-portage work so
> we can claim it's irrelevant, while shifting the conditions for
> accepting it whenever it is convenient, while silently adding the
> competing method in-tree so it's all decided now anyway ...

Conditions for accepting it?  What are those, and how have they changed?

Rich