From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-65540-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FA61387FD for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 00:58:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38CF3E0A9E; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 00:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C098E0964 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 00:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id il7so11061716vcb.32 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:58:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=eUIii52QfwGe3+jFBNk2SHBcyRa8A6lFoiz004AfQUk=; b=S6W33w3yr9b0Bc8TDPOYHIGparmgIyw+J4vZY0A/Lb401GLqb9q4D89jQQoSm+QrXU TN9hACBI/fOWrskxpNYU+qGSp3PcLWgNb1Yv9nfGatJUnvdky+sSS39LqmS7PxzPTNgP FapQe/cZofrIjtkQYcZ514OgAtQPVE5cP+CunQKOIXioYgc6BqCSgoXRYano7p1rTM/I ntebuEM+jGmHWeHojFyZNvrsFR1Mb5Xm4c4cX6P+BofFPe1Eq56cg3ks0+kb9gFiBGMq fMfw15Wvsvxj+3IIGlpctiWoHbqlR3BozFMZrRR2u3yjKjhe8kaTqMC0LzussluHTFIf Rxlg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.12.36 with SMTP id v4mr14071015vdb.20.1396400311087; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.29.142 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:58:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <533B5620.1070105@gentoo.org> References: <20140401001617.42fdc3bc@pomiot.lan> <CAB9SyzRXkymQHae=QysHhBAbCs+MMSqir9QOGc8YQ35gJQfQ5w@mail.gmail.com> <1396360717.20406.12.camel@rook> <CAGfcS_mfeyWWnQd8osyDwMj1By0dF9jaY507CMvF59iMfh=u8w@mail.gmail.com> <533B5620.1070105@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:58:30 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L8zB8g_2TjbIkEVkLG2ZRaqbiJc Message-ID: <CAGfcS_m_u95r7LRS+J9NdTGG=5gEj+VErKDpD6OmFv4hYaxR7A@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stable masks on multilib packages From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 56eee1c2-3887-4f63-8277-0d22ed2b2435 X-Archives-Hash: 677a0ec8df326353631067755de686a8 On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> wrote: > Now let's just continue to ignore the existing multilib-portage work so > we can claim it's irrelevant, while shifting the conditions for > accepting it whenever it is convenient, while silently adding the > competing method in-tree so it's all decided now anyway ... Conditions for accepting it? What are those, and how have they changed? Rich