From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64499-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0265C138247
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B1BBE0F56;
	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:59:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378C8E0F3D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:59:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id tq11so6475552ieb.12
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:59:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=/oRhPGcahrkNlROiYd+JVNVoWYUtvxmf7hEcTUPFOC8=;
        b=bBhxS215xskwWg0I3YpHHRzqn11B8JlmtmsB7rMpNCB5lRqv4zHDudORPo5TVQgU59
         XubIqRpuerqgy+QKy18tXIAXpbnMv55fA1UxBBevEBmhHauJtuj4Ayzst0bXdRdd5oGy
         reHG0UIQjrTYD9aLCBnSy14AOBiS9K+WGZUuoFxJtaAK3+NZrHqPpWly/yJyswPDd08X
         AHuQmi7LbChWBYgWsod6Bjy1Xdhz6Wl4ohpcEmvH8EWZoVxemuRPes6bC5SgfzonhC+y
         0DDmoD+4U4+ZSXT72dNjHObKjFh4Fqmy6LotKvPy+VG1uLhinwuHLBwIgizRcO68bDRy
         1PCg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.51.15.130 with SMTP id fo2mr12414194igd.28.1390226389537;
 Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:59:49 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.73.99 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 05:59:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home>
	<CAAr7Pr-1GsHbL5zzyS5u-N8QsR+Qf-tKev2N-O4k94AgWHY8_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 08:59:49 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WnSuGca4UvsAZmne7hupMTiW8cg
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mZof7ni67U_ob2DWiXBqvs8DLrx_1ar7e7avXQ6Vq-uA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 7f2981e9-cf5a-4d58-b918-f121908f2ab8
X-Archives-Hash: da7d68fcad780ab402be18aabf320de6

On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org> wrote:
>     #gentoo-qa | @hwoarang: pretty sure diego had the powerzz to suspend
>     people
>
> Whether this has actually happened is something that is questionable;

Not that this necessarily needs to make it into the GLEP, and I'm
still on the fence regarding whether we really need to make this
change at all, but things like access suspensions and other
administrative/disciplinary procedures should be documented.  I think
whether this is a matter of public record or not is open to debate,
but I don't like the fact that we can really say for sure when/if this
has actually happened.

Rich