From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-49913-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1S10C3-0001ai-8b
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:48:35 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1094DE1096;
	Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:48:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9744BE1071
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:47:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjg9 with SMTP id jg9so459983bkc.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of freemanrich@gmail.com designates 10.204.152.75 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.152.75;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of freemanrich@gmail.com designates 10.204.152.75 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=freemanrich@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.152.75])
        by 10.204.152.75 with SMTP id f11mr1637312bkw.127.1330109265803 (num_hops = 1);
        Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=bg4w4vkcK1+Bgjrn6BhVqQgL31KykUR7U8/vyxGJ8g8=;
        b=Wbsc3hSpldcylSdDOB9oz+fuHY/bXowm0++9WJ7DPyJx944WVvUsOoTn+FlPkhNv3a
         eJInl15sbW1oBM6L0vf2FysbHx846mmY5xRDYQAzuILfLTY7Mp1/+FiSj0hKUQ0aTbfL
         APli0g5jnas8rNwdtVviOG3lytBHWnN6/HMJE=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.152.75 with SMTP id f11mr1354468bkw.127.1330109265706;
 Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.205.32.194 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:47:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120224154327.61c051ad@gentoo.org>
References: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org>
	<20120224154327.61c051ad@gentoo.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:47:45 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GCCXUEQx0AlG-FCHXQjNWKA9Sxw
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mP+q=CM0zeJAAd7iKJ8wKz+6XFJM9-7QZvEF6Ve_HPAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: effbfb07-b4a4-44d6-9aad-63edcc05f7b3
X-Archives-Hash: 97eb83b5be648b1894cb7148b9135b1b

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> moreover the && wont delete the lib if revdep-rebuild failed i think,
> so it should be even safer to copy/paste :)

Am I the only paranoid person who moves them rather than unlinking
them?  Oh, if only btrfs were stable...

Rich