From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1DA1381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3080E0CE3; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (mail-vb0-f47.google.com [209.85.212.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3C7E0CB8 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 14:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x13so4081989vbb.6 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:44:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DlhQlDRVSOOdoEbbP3tsuP5zTs+LY1F2c2Y/81fZDfY=; b=Y2RVesIrFJRTuH/CXzlUZNM+Cbr6G4UTQsYGR+w6rTmmA2bPo+CrrvkafPRKtOsUeA EJsT0PdC1x+DJ7Uai82ooSKVGUN+xwOLY7r3aS2w308xyI3jFw8iojo3s2xCnpO9ERIa tgP52n5oFoOulnAfySWcx+4azeMmFkOSquK0Z/aWMI0/WqxG7GB8no1c8G5orm6MyMFg xJ5+va//W3YyO/kRDzIXoWOjg+Z9/fxWrW1H0kPyJ7FAAz0+dcsW2UNgEQCVO6raVchR FAPJok0diiMOt1jpo1ZOmfbLxRbzqzV/UUpO+3uuvYA2VlBALPRik70KbiTFjZd1CrA0 qCvw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.243.234 with SMTP id xb10mr11231600vdc.68.1369579478017; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:44:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.168.233 with HTTP; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:44:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130526160739.37ccad2a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130525153827.61ed2ca4@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <5d832c4680bfbd3ae7da6dfe5608be2d.squirrel@www.antarean.org> <20130525215520.77ca8df0@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130526151526.1c2393c7@gentoo.org> <20130526160739.37ccad2a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 10:44:37 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lkSUVlmM2tt6yElehpYMmw0vZ4k Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 140525d7-64ea-405f-88ab-015c9ac610ee X-Archives-Hash: 5a2eb692c75978d5908ae239f793f238 On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:15:26 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >> Cc: TomWij@gentoo.org > > Please don't CC me, this causes duplicate mails; one of both does not > include reply-to. Nobody else that has responded to me did this before. > > Unless you can give me an awesome procmail rule to process these... :) > :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache :0 a: .duplicates/new (or /dev/null as you prefer) I'm sure it isn't perfect, but I've been running it for years. Between lists and aliases I'd be buried in dups otherwise. Apologies for the OT, but I figured this was useful, and you did ask... Rich