From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59922-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6661381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:12:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE5F2E0B7D;
	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:12:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1BEE0B68
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id gd11so5468867vcb.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 04:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=H78NarvkBMkCbLXazYHnehO+BJepb1Zz1ZHOrgQ7BFE=;
        b=YcVKidhbrtylzyHFWNtcKHpmW7CtksGtdEFxwpW0L8BOC3RIjJQRhG03hbAHKga60m
         dJH9EK1xWRN1IhkmTBo6oJCTD2fxR3JuNBo9mcRkKRJmq8LbUrLsBx2JFY3Fi2s+ANo+
         FtIuGLj6l+Ca1iy18izNmtwCiU4ZRB+EsxetnH9VmKwoWkMrMC38jUJ/J9sN3BwUp4x2
         GBaSFsO132S9swO6duShxI3I7ae5yUvZRzJSjIHu5DMZWuQXkTW8GNohAJUA43HpLT+W
         WNy8EsfJGMaScqbuKQjElGR0cZJ73uN6GR3Lb9RLeboLPXy65ifV/p5DqneE8xm8QMM/
         sS5w==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.33.236 with SMTP id u12mr27648201vdi.101.1367233920062;
 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 04:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.168.4 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 04:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130428213316.763c3713@caribou.gateway.2wire.net>
References: <CAHcsgXTfmipSEgM0_9rgwJQz8F537wpoedY2pJd7FBY7swRS9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5178ED34.6050202@necoro.eu>
	<20130425151205.25908.qmail@stuge.se>
	<20130428213316.763c3713@caribou.gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:11:59 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: J5ta9S8EIYRLxXTi-hTUCj8vOPg
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_mLgJXJUis7nJjGkFtv-S8YBtnfsDu8v=0r68BDdpWdcA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Useflags: xsl vs xslt
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 5f8c0194-27c9-4467-b492-5059306bf60a
X-Archives-Hash: 025e962fb3b741be80ac6241a4fdf43b

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:05 +0200
> Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote:
>
>> Diego Elio Petten=F2 wrote:
>> > The correct one should be xslt and that's it..
>>
>> Can you please motivate your opinion? Saying "that's it" is quite hostil=
e.
>
> Terse maybe.  Blunt.  Hostile?  No.

Maybe not hostile, but it certainly is blunt, and it basically has an
implied "because I said so."

Nobody learns from a blunt answer.  Potentially people learn from one
that has a one-sentence rationale, even if it is just "for the reasons
already stated."  However, that is better accomplished by just ++'ing
the previous post.

Rich