From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12696198005 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0B0FE06F9; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0259AE0462; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id c13so5439596ieb.37 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:40:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yW+ee1q3GQKaWMBN+rIKNkcmWwmWdMrIjWFI2L7CUn4=; b=w94DTLVrS9SroV310LD0estQL0K8PE9TjHGjoU79+LlTSJQFCBCRYphTeeDiT5TJxf dVKlh/zNsFhBxCJJGSNLq5uQgDxZUubJbtqF4F4hQcehZKs0Iqx/9UX3BKFvQPkcyCWl F8v48SU1oA1X6Eh3uEgoZ84IEptRxZjFqLCCjLgMZTu0x+j985NAprjL1QTrxdmW+AlR YiqnWRqD7Hlm47F9XXQGhWTxLb0LFLBoyVbkQ1tY5svuexBuVZmOA8+qKgWslsVIpN0Z GrxB8tW04unJJLk20pN3x0pKH+ZUlCj2nk/WSJhme/4JAsH1P0o1e7vTkOz4WfO4bIEz H3Bw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.7.200 with SMTP id op8mr7052282icb.30.1363041644601; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.21.98 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:40:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130311211955.GB32527@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:40:44 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wyGuq-Jxji2t0sA8QC_JRVk75u4 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Forming Gentoo Policy - Copyright Assignment and Attribution From: Rich Freeman To: "gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org" Cc: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec516204b0a698c04d7addde2 X-Archives-Salt: ec92340b-c5ed-40f2-a5fe-386dd35a4624 X-Archives-Hash: 63ba5389de63594375a5f3d6323e51e9 --bcaec516204b0a698c04d7addde2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mar 11, 2013 6:22 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined, > > > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license > > > agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based > > > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week. > > I've already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again: > > If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'll have to > > stop contributing to Gentoo. > Did you read the entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options > as (voluntary FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO). > > Could you clarify that you're objecting to that as well? In your case, > you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commits > would have the DCO SoB signature. > > The kernel is where we got the mandatory DCO concept. This one is my bad. I wrote CLA when I meant DCO. No change intended. This is what happens when you send a thirty second follow-up to a policy formed over two weeks, and then step away to eat... But, at least we know people read it! Rich --bcaec516204b0a698c04d7addde2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mar 11, 2013 6:22 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On M= on, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, M= ar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was = outlined,
> > > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign = a contributor license
> > > agreement and an option to also sig= n an assignment-like document based
> > > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week.
> > I&#= 39;ve already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again:
>= > =A0 =A0 =A0 If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'= ll have to
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 stop contributing to Gentoo.
> Did you read the= entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options
> as (voluntar= y FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO).
>
> Could you clarify that you= 9;re objecting to that as well? In your case,
> you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commi= ts
> would have the DCO SoB signature.
>
> The kernel is = where we got the mandatory DCO concept.

This one is my bad. I wrote = CLA when I meant DCO.

No change intended. This is what happens when you send a thirty second = follow-up to a policy formed over two weeks, and then step away to eat...
But, at least we know people read it!

Rich --bcaec516204b0a698c04d7addde2--