[gentoo-dev] Re: Forming Gentoo Policy - Copyright Assignment and Attribution

[Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1264 bytes --]

On Mar 11, 2013 6:22 PM, "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:51:17PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> > > which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> > > agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based
> > > on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week.
> > I've already said this before, but I guess I need to say it again:
> >       If a contributor license is required to be signed, I'll have to
> >       stop contributing to Gentoo.
> Did you read the entire email? We explicitly listed one of the options
> as (voluntary FLA/CLA AND mandatory DCO).
>
> Could you clarify that you're objecting to that as well? In your case,
> you could elect NOT to sign the FLA/CLA. Regardless, all of your commits
> would have the DCO SoB signature.
>
> The kernel is where we got the mandatory DCO concept.

This one is my bad. I wrote CLA when I meant DCO.

No change intended. This is what happens when you send a thirty second
follow-up to a policy formed over two weeks, and then step away to eat...

But, at least we know people read it!

Rich

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1511 bytes --]