public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new category, app-containers
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:13:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_m3humq8s5R=v4vUkfFR4YC_5qE=KuvSZ3X2GFv75Ly1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497459605.32080.0.camel@gentoo.org>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On śro, 2017-06-14 at 11:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I am about to write two new ebuilds for packages for Gentoo that are for
>> container-related utilities.
>>
>> Currently, the best place to put them would be app-emulation, or
>> app-misc or dev-util, probably app-emulation would be my first choice.
>>
>> Is it time to start thinking about an app-containers category?
>> If so, is it ok for me to start an app-containers category with these
>> packages then we can look into moving other packages to it?
>>
>
> You don't create a new category for two packages. Do you have more use
> cases for it? I think usually people provide a fair number of existing
> packages that are in different categories to prove the necessity
> of a new category.

I'm on the fence about whether we should create a new category, but
presumably other things like docker/etc would end up in there as well.

"Emulation" is a bit of a generic category right now.  We don't
distinguish between actual emulation vs virtualization or
containerization.  I'm not sure if there is value in making that
distinction, or if we did if even those three categories would be
sufficient.

-- 
Rich


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 16:11 [gentoo-dev] rfc: new category, app-containers William Hubbs
2017-06-14 16:16 ` M. J. Everitt
2017-06-14 16:47   ` William Hubbs
2017-06-14 17:00 ` Michał Górny
2017-06-14 17:06   ` William Hubbs
2017-06-14 17:14     ` Mike Gilbert
2017-06-14 17:13   ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2017-06-14 20:33 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2017-06-14 22:42 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2017-06-15 15:35   ` William Hubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGfcS_m3humq8s5R=v4vUkfFR4YC_5qE=KuvSZ3X2GFv75Ly1A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox