From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-63275-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A791381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:02:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A775AE0B61;
	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:02:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0B12E0B13
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:02:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lc6so257391vcb.11
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 05:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=dVsyx4vbrrwNE30E6gEU7g2F7cMAjCTjZFMRUw43urM=;
        b=y76+zSjL0Yn1g+53vuwU7NOJx6px0Ss5vRkWBnyju/ZVbNx2P2jLhUW3qzFe7/kwk1
         FKhJDcDlVOF/+a46x3EmzqSXlewgCGnP6TajKBAT0+Hu8XkhHCVBRB1yRgqzAt447qH/
         KR4eEAV9YWFJI7n+UCW+AwCr8sR/lFyQrudLAd1Vu/heqkMPkO0FsPDcE7lnBPqoJqvn
         tavnr326yWY1+SQYTY82tNvaS3//gfxQ6/nRWWxD1CQUnHmn7cpu6m358ws3CEK7EGWn
         JnJbjTNucs9XghC5w43zIjzid+xpCiV/wPzojrIRMJ7MZPfgHBJtS5NTCtJwe1Rkqd5T
         j9sw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.156.106 with SMTP id wd10mr14438100veb.7.1382443324116;
 Tue, 22 Oct 2013 05:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.108.199 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 05:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <21094.8359.839444.73512@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
References: <1382171551.9715.9.camel@belkin5>
	<1382266000.24878.55.camel@belkin5>
	<21094.7269.650111.205704@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<1382424169.1012.5.camel@belkin5>
	<21094.8359.839444.73512@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:02:04 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hxaTJygcIu31ToJ0ZnK7w4s6xnA
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_m-a2ejd3RE9iGUAp_Vgn-=swoKqHm1yqoN9+o50bSZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item about Gnome 3.8
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: gnome <gnome@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 27419a8c-adb6-4985-845a-377459bdb878
X-Archives-Hash: 8347ae823fb321f6d10e35707cd2e85f

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
>> Lets compare it with the 2.32 one that looks to were valid in the
>> past:
>
> That we had less than optimal news items in the past doesn't mean that
> we shouldn't do better now.

I also think that the need to move to systemd is certainly worth a mention.

I don't think news items need to be completely self-contained, but
they should include any significant issues.  Changing an init system
and re-configuring all your daemons is certainly a significant issue.

Rich