From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unstabling a package
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:04:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_m-2NX4L7nXOu0dBvFEqnqGkoXNucXDT0MAQLvwxw_p9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFWqQMQfQh6=Mx9QBffi1wCZHgYCeGJTjdmZcUJsuFAWs5veiA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Any specific procedure to unstable a package? Specifically MythTV.
> While there's a lot of user interest in the package, there's just not
> enough dev help with the package to really keep it up to snuff to what
> could be considered stable. Its woefully behind...
The current unstable package for mythtv was the upstream stable
version only a few weeks ago. I was contemplating stabilizing it,
although with 0.24.2 out it might make more sense to target that
version. The current stable version should certainly be removed ASAP
- it contains numerous bugs and some QA issues that have been fixed in
the unstable version. The only thing the stable version has going for
it is support for more plugins.
If I get a long weekend I might try upgrading to 0.24.2 and getting
that into portage (assuming nobody else beats me to it).
Unfortunately my only mythtv system is essentially a production
system, so I can't really have it down for any length of time.
If we do make mythtv unstable I'd prefer that we not drop versions too
quickly. If somebody else is able to keep up with the bleeding-edge
versions more power to them, but if the consensus is that the older
versions have to go most likely I'd just start maintaining my own
overlay and abandon the one in portage. I can really only do a
serious version bump maybe 2-3 times per year at most.
I'm not convinced that going completely unstable is really going to
solve anything, however. I'd rather have a core of stable
functionality than something bleeding-edge for something like mythtv.
Then again, that might just be personal preference.
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-20 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 2:46 [gentoo-dev] Unstabling a package Doug Goldstein
2012-02-20 3:04 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2012-02-22 5:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2012-02-23 9:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeff Horelick
2012-02-23 12:04 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGfcS_m-2NX4L7nXOu0dBvFEqnqGkoXNucXDT0MAQLvwxw_p9g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox