From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F10138010 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8EB55E124A; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-f177.google.com (mail-ve0-f177.google.com [209.85.128.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB6EE1243 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id jw11so2845628veb.8 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Cxqt5lN4BSWfUIAOKSQ9UUpwT5dYGEeaUPO1g1UfK+M=; b=yqecbKlquKfDatToa+XngedKnPyVU5Pg9qqHaryK6yCR/r7sqSVS2ihL2agElfYm6X 1bLtfzDRTEySnbaXbGP1nCbdsfzVWZSZwUjT1c/PQaGqD+Jz7RL6ikggf51v9uGaQ2Q8 ISUjKpwKePwK+aytTGSEhplI0K6F7HPCkkSGrL69n3hardXqsmbNGnwBWJ0mOoSsr2Lx 1yFp7j/su8L7gGmCS//9pPctneo5xG/W+Y+3tbe5xGFTaI/NjOKJ9+j70Kux38TaW2FE Kk49FaJG7A3NPCIpjVBBTkp7mnfN/HGUFlFm7sPSZIatkVsc1MyR+Le+ayi472ufI49b JPKA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.154.66 with SMTP id n2mr10222039vcw.40.1364841249650; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.101.225 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:34:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201304011412.22990.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <201303310159.53246.vapier@gentoo.org> <201304011412.22990.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:34:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -KPBYeNVCoURetFTwHC4C-TaTBg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-apps/texinfo vs @system From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 29eae70c-93f4-47dd-8810-545976eab3ae X-Archives-Hash: 265b424ff94909cbec44bacbd46ca619 On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > people seem happy with this, so i'll have the release team do a test build and > see how it goes. ++ If any of the system packages are going to pull in texinfo then it really should have a use flag for the perl-requiring parts. Otherwise we're not accomplishing much. As already suggested all packages should still install info files, and those who greatly care can install mask them. If while they're at it they can have the latest i686 and amd64 builds not be hardened or nomultilib builds that would also be wonderful (this issue has been coming up here and there for a few months now and drives my automated scripts nuts). :) http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/gentoo/releases/amd64/autobuilds/latest-stage3-amd64.txt http://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/gentoo/releases/x86/autobuilds/latest-stage3-i686.txt https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443472 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463644 Rich