From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60156-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB081381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 May 2013 16:53:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57D58E081D;
	Thu,  9 May 2013 16:53:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7611FE07C2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 May 2013 16:53:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ar20so6032610iec.11
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 09 May 2013 09:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=gurLzehzzwysmt6FV6VxqAx+zVgQb5API1C5syJL/to=;
        b=TM3Gf6nG4g4u/JaqnfiY2ftT3scmxUg+9JPePuAcKQBOZClOFjRRqkddQ2M5s1qinB
         jaY5R4WZ8r3mZGZXGqCSQb2+NKemk5UILvAu8oP9e3wAwNQAMBtlS/A4ZfE1hvnw7N7X
         7tucMniliatLXF9XYqH8PvlFX+0KUjWoebvv0qdrU3rAsgzs/uBPQabWWQYDE2WfAgcc
         0eDDhCJpHErH4NaBrmt0wd/MDmdmGVjVgWVtvHeOF4P6OdLg08fJvPq04LinmDsuIPfL
         sgYr8quyKd/fKSAHlXT5CGvoPPiHoRy1n3WisbvOHcXWLSGwJKokDkuMONgVrVXmUBt7
         cJgg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.127.242 with SMTP id nj18mr5806728igb.47.1368118424654;
 Thu, 09 May 2013 09:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.28.34 with HTTP; Thu, 9 May 2013 09:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130509184444.24514e95@gentoo.org>
References: <CAN3Atvo+RgmFgCYMzqjsuL4G89cJv_J7SXg42qfT3r1xQtEuTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB9SyzR_OxTeZhWy8v1z06gWjBMQQZ7iyGQWKHcW+3tw+Rk-ew@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN3AtvrfwkyNzBNX6Hbs-v2KL-ynqFKqBzDbVw3vjZ9TF6OOHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB9SyzS1p5tG-=sWRiRoSFROokC5pJ-8x19GG-WS-vHGVwuWBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130509014836.GA1968@waltdnes.org>
	<20130509040134.1e784795@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
	<518B72DA.50501@opensource.dyc.edu>
	<20130509184444.24514e95@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 12:53:44 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: z21lyMIFkbVd-E7IX1zgaZrf6Oo
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_ktxzqJp-73tTYXaHS0PoVG=YVu-tK_SnY0yfAScoLBiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to "normal" users
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: basile@opensource.dyc.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 1f03a025-8307-4996-acb5-775a86dc6c9c
X-Archives-Hash: d3c9161568e4fd8f0b36ef7d959a7fc0

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org>=
 wrote:
> We should probably consider extending the INSTALL_MASK a bit. A good
> idea would be to allow repositories to pre-define names
> for INSTALL_MASK (alike USE flags) and allow portage to control them
> over those names.

We'd need a corresponding way to unmask stuff as well, if we went that
route.  It would add value for stuff like the embedded profile, but I
wouldn't want to see it used in the base profiles.

Rich