From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA515139694 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 114F31FC0C8; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com (mail-yw0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2CD51FC0C0 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id s143so3157920ywg.4 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:20:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=rBPmZ+8AfK48jNGxJ9x0L/OM6LyKDWHBw6birPh5hYg=; b=TtlPgcDTE+PZqLxpW1Krtvzmy0/l7RF/AJUzjEJmYOPhpQ7pNP7xDAG7FWGoMfbrsw YW/SMzxyihhuQxhO0v5T2BnpdHLufDf5lkbhx1WIQaI2ZBMSn503OFmMe2o1FK6w6v3+ JGXCr+Wg9mMJoWk/C9zLy08Dr67kDlTZD7dla6Gl7tGMoOD+sOpySr75Ur6wg7TPyAnJ rQYoKOrQPZvMKbSEvLPWxTR5YJsNcSR+WEZazitYlA/NGSwjkW8QKQ1NxCKVrIuHPlF5 8OdWPI0h0iScx7lflo7ytVwwz5neRs1x/gFzwIf1x5zQcu4AAGoddo2WvuHkKron2d2s yGlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rBPmZ+8AfK48jNGxJ9x0L/OM6LyKDWHBw6birPh5hYg=; b=Rn0DwIm54/yDo43Ki9CekdNKKgnU+KKrzLXvg4oKMXqJ+xJcMsgF5F/M7IiRhgXsah Xo/cmBSra1EbElwY6wf5VA9t44GoDsjd4R9/HLMS3G1zSzLdxW34MVzmOuk2wb9BTvSb vDXoXm7nL3NwLvTYTjdkFaXRDx+yYyCajiZhjsYYwGA6hn7ihyRFgUh3tgH7UlmKA8Ah qHICLLwTZQCerh4FdhJhSep6XxAt6hFA8CvLfRsE9YVun8bQAvYVW31MbTzjeECa/4Xy OKtFiD1fsSnZSahzFtB3OSUC2Gfy7cTyfzGwPxhghJ+OTmB4KbHOMePWHypCAVmBmwMR OrIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111pCHuDmi99IZn27D5q+xBCqwg9+Z8FbP6IUyiVa8x5zwysCetj rLsm8+MpyX2A9o0f5lgF+xcyIBt6HFzv X-Received: by 10.129.102.6 with SMTP id a6mr1470488ywc.50.1501089635485; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.129.71.3 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1500969906.1206.1.camel@gentoo.org> <0A428688-D128-4767-A9E5-E0F2D3004B18@gentoo.org> <1500990510.795.12.camel@gentoo.org> <22904.24348.825939.705028@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> From: Rich Freeman Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:20:34 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NWWCfUfd44pkfVOVrw5nKnSYxGQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow To: gentoo-dev Cc: Ulrich Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: a860a8f0-d7bb-4b53-8ac4-a2360c20c8cd X-Archives-Hash: 801fa54b3187a3c3d9f976405dcec87f On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 07/26/2017 11:21 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> The same applies to #123456 in the summary line, though. I don't see a >> good reason for using a URL after the "Bug:" keyword as long as bare >> numbers are used elsewhere. > > For Bug you'd often refer to upstream reports or other distros, so you > need it in a generic form which url provides, having a separate > Gentoo-Bug properly defined to ID only solves the ambiguity. > I was thinking that it would make far more sense to use "Bug" for Gentoo bugs, and use something like "Reference" or "Remote-Bug" for non-Gentoo bugs. 99% of the time commits will reference a Gentoo bug. If you wanted to reference others you'd probably have it linked in the Gentoo bug anyway so duplicating it in the commit seems wasteful. In any case, I think what matters is picking one format and then sticking it in the repoman template so that people don't have to type it. Also, I suggest using either URLs or bug numbers, but not both. Otherwise you end up having to copy the URL over, then copy the ID only and paste it in the summary. That is an extra step. -- Rich