From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-81862-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A581396D0
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:09:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38992E0F46;
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wr0-x231.google.com (mail-wr0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::231])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50DAE0F35
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x43so20481702wrb.3
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to;
bh=sf70Aj3BhRBQ6Bzx9vTOhDxpLg9gJpkwSx+HFWgkJa4=;
b=qPgeWZ5V7CfbGoI/GqsQfONqkpWoZ36m9L2pQv53LDDcA0UqR7dHswIqbj2rGoNQ1B
B+l4mERGaFMGuULhhT4NpYQVhEDa+UNh07OKrILl1MDXfPbA0yQVREh1LEtzz1XwKIEu
yQg/MSgzQWoT1ncCAsYSnheE/mSXHRvXMhG9ZS2/+qIZuwSI8JK4EyWL+SWIYnbE+6cK
WTVxChx0byZNG8zYWJwYP9PGFRcS92TW0uRY1FOpGEoaP6B041LN1iVyVBHmvqZGZ0vd
rtda2/UIKxFrl4qHUKTpE6GMOEtYNWRTzGovoYc565CjfZQKgF3YE9aE2XeYRgB5Ny9i
KgUA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=sf70Aj3BhRBQ6Bzx9vTOhDxpLg9gJpkwSx+HFWgkJa4=;
b=Q8Lcp0q9PeYu75f6DeHPuOTSmIHn0FA61M627nWPyn2iXemdsI7I6q75LHJC1BUuWY
4SPzUl9uiM8zD7fy0aBYG6k0vloRuR7ZzMqAA5vIArFtt7eo4qsUd2XmKBkusA2iSBS4
yOwctT2UZVGHoALz+RkWAsG6ZLV7QM1442yuMXEkOvL5+Ccv0YvbXeHeS/XcrmYEpKqa
dZ3vCPnHrPPGHnMb9Vuj2GOX8awKchL2SDwowGobMujU6KE3WPiE1sAEfFedaFlJ4Ipj
B5nnhFOyGC+9uQaGtDXTlg43O8W+IkIK9VgrSnQoWWGmM/vGyATZfRGVpPsYa5PSzVmf
IEUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iBagvM1G450kRoKOqD1nY80BCOqTCbDq/+3+noXIyXpsLJ8VNT
bFt1klc3k3cAzT89RWGdVZ74yKpBtjXb
X-Received: by 10.223.163.90 with SMTP id d26mr1698301wrb.82.1502899759334;
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.169.238 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 09:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <pan$24f57$bf4e5278$b465f99$50e523b4@cox.net>
References: <dbed2635-d00e-0707-cfc4-6bb472a170b8@gentoo.org>
<1502521423.1045.0.camel@gentoo.org> <4ebddcf6-1d84-684a-6e3c-96bb65c24fd2@gentoo.org>
<CAGfcS_miBMY0BJihzcb9VE-y=f_N7S=VPJWeLMicbk7LQQHcNw@mail.gmail.com>
<9a9b48c9-db50-f4e5-d4bb-cb4e0ebe8858@gentoo.org> <20170814120140.GA758@meriadoc.perfinion.com>
<400510bf-a54b-e1ad-cb42-3e094b86bfde@gentoo.org> <pan$24f57$bf4e5278$b465f99$50e523b4@cox.net>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 12:09:16 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7u7ZwASQmziKxgBMzYQToSC-Xow
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_keCgpBx7L2pDRD8uSZ7rj-f=hYDVduu22yEVs2FR_aCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Revisions for USE flag changes
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: da6c95b7-9ef3-4c7f-8e83-12087664dc44
X-Archives-Hash: 5946ee3448f8bcd4504a1ee0ae848792
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
>
> But even if that's the case (I wouldn't know), it's the case due to a
> deliberate decision of those going "under the bus", because portage is
> the default, and by choosing to use some other PM, they've deliberately
> chosen its (non-PMS) features over those of portage.
>
None of this really has anything to do with PMS as far as I can tell.
There is no PMS requirement for --changed-use and such. There
certainly might be a usability requirement for it, which is why it
usually exists in one way or another.
--
Rich