From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-69229-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DEB138A1A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:55:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7BA8E0881;
	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:55:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F9EE086A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:55:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v10so13170479pde.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:55:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=JOzIWh+qZ6ofEKXHR43XZdm6zC7HGK9qoscGbRgjwJE=;
        b=KQ8B8S8yHMdNkk23CDfleAHQuKcJ7XrZN4NV/60BKLj09kDVwnmtJppS8HiunWvlcF
         HIutQdpFSRqufY0z9bNeQ8/1PVj0oy4dei/Jpe4Y6P4/Jq8ur7YH8x3iOrrXsSAK+8Wt
         Z6YWcscm3mgJ7Z2Ubeo6wit+9t+Ee4nfC5TjOna4KJKt1+Sj2lNPjDBqa42Q75Vsd6vT
         lTyX9AmimvOJtbUk+laF14MR1VOuKC2ZB6IIltqPVlcm68uPyqzU8Nf+aE4O3lMDBqHx
         OtBjAciYkKp8Kq+CL/KkALGxn447hanYCJDsOYVgM5+MqEflXv0Z/4cxB2QvdiEfcOlp
         oRig==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.132.67 with SMTP id os3mr36740442pbb.1.1422294909840;
 Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.1.103 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:55:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20150126160108.27420.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <53C12C21.6070605@gentoo.org>
	<54C1A91C.8010702@gentoo.org>
	<20150123065607.74cd64d1@pomiot.lan>
	<54C24BAE.6080206@gentoo.org>
	<54C2AC87.2020707@gentoo.org>
	<CAGfcS_mOg05eVbr4OjqYeBs9yg6Y8wqc9i+n94+8EBqwk7C6Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150126104328.2147.qmail@stuge.se>
	<CAGfcS_nAQd5fyqVJgzyHn-A1SWdVWE2QDD4C2D+yQ-xTzw0FJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150126160108.27420.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:55:09 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: eK3Ju3Opolu1Ap7WNiRk7i0h4c4
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kavyj35O41qZ0w1-w=GPkzDR8brtTKArm-PM0bk8H5aw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] LibreSSL, introduce virtual/openssl
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 07094d32-3a7e-4259-a30d-bdf28d931538
X-Archives-Hash: 3f4e615681de30133cc88430ea8afdb7

On Jan 26, 2015 11:01 AM, "Peter Stuge" <peter@stuge.se> wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>
> > there wouldn't be an /etc/init.d, but rather a bazillion
> > /pkg/guid/etc/init.d directories or something like that
>
> I guess an abstraction akin to pkg-config could solve the problem.
>

Sort of. You can't call a service "mysql" if both mysql and mariadb
use that name.  Namespaces seem to always be a compromise between
convenience (I'm a sysadmin, not a system), and flexibility (if we
just identified users by guids and expected RSA authentication at the
keyboard we'd never have a problem).

-- 
Rich