From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E566058973 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ABA0321C1F0; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (mail-ig0-f176.google.com [209.85.213.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A638821C1D8 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hb3so76589135igb.0 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:43:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=JBtkba3xdJXwxo0q8yP9UljGTqsmkblMgqvyZvq5SVk=; b=N9XkcwI47xFrpYja9UCeqsJE4VaWwAFYs04iCTzVGjZrIcetqyYO7sk/s7ZL0Gu+ge wBmaBKkQwAb9qUUsP3PAg7pH7Aw11gt2bdG9okMW3LxDTimlNpZrlp/BpVcSwhlGtoEI MRKDySPx/P6vVdryrOWSQPhVDOWWWQdCqwQRgouBDvUNQGluqLkh/2SRs7egJpT1qdSW I262fOFUwIsuj+C4xEdzziUzJHw1dA3d873Os4rwgFrWTHBQAYcuMux4UKKnVCErq5YA J4EhL7sVEShEjqggiBGXPcbZxWEwFacdl++HnNacJHxZoweoYAdU/WxFmU85PBCgolEq 0y/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JBtkba3xdJXwxo0q8yP9UljGTqsmkblMgqvyZvq5SVk=; b=Mn+yvKWH0QDLVqzPgXQyLuwdnPhOGp36TeqqWqXF5C3twYECyBV/xqFX6e3IihTf5i Ttdn0EUvIFpPLJHHrEtRqBUGl0+TfG59ZnX62mexWkIgQp0qM84Js7Mpd5VSpcudjtN6 UGYDtQAcJewGVa3rmBTmUZk8qc2jujkg39hxMCjxLIdRZ8i6m7CvP8RTLWUzgZKIdEwj vg1Q7qsSIMZAFdOkzJuwoXmEZrV3BiGHsFkiDBjZ9bR0EdXEpipfy0y8Cuqo6XZmFTIS qrNgAV72bSWI7sTPez6Muci9aIT/PUfmRjp81aPM0r0L3yCKl2DW9+gGpmDWbP2CIxu8 qRkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQsCx6qlKVNNbwYQzVfGMNe4Ore4kQ2fQ7HAmRoDHEXzG+RRp6loTnPzMJUEoHlYdVFCQLNrEPH1Y2e7g== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.160.11 with SMTP id xg11mr3987747igb.51.1455021783028; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 04:43:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.225.228 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:43:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56B9DD61.4020201@gentoo.org> References: <56B85B06.7020500@gentoo.org> <56B936DB.1010407@gentoo.org> <56B939C4.20804@gentoo.org> <56B978C3.2020304@gentoo.org> <56B9DD61.4020201@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:43:02 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pZiTELLEk9dNtmWD30DWZQ0u34o Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: b2373e95-d3b2-490c-8831-2aeb9cf370fe X-Archives-Hash: 745283d29bed6d38c2328c8e845d5fe7 On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > Given that the push for kdbus is more a political API move than > anything, I can see eudev sticking to the current interface and > working just fine. I doubt udev is going to make that switch until kdbus is merged into the kernel. I doubt that Linus will accept it simply over politics. Once it is in the mainline kernel, why wouldn't the eudev maintainers switch? At that point just about anybody using dbus is going to be making a switch to kdbus. Not using kdbus will be like not using /proc. -- Rich