From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-70490-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A934E138CCF
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 23 May 2015 11:16:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66A4FE0944;
	Sat, 23 May 2015 11:16:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8E5E093B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 23 May 2015 11:16:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbsb11 with SMTP id sb11so7528640igb.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=nfVp0y/jUm2ex5G6oDDFi9QE5KwGI7eGdef9005aXok=;
        b=hnUM7Vz4qraN1IxAhRgQZiAtmF/QIyH5CjwkXqHgtSmDBIX27HalzpC2YB/Cnz7NCb
         4Hn81t4r4C5GeFtq4EHYT+q6c5rbhbH4oYmcNKj5erVfGyWHlBeB3EDvt1lRtkHQTLiP
         J2DaLnmn6fSk5K6J78Ay666l/RCiptf6TLBEuIi4WguHPVMQLuCdKWjHD0rouA9GANN9
         59xXf6dMln8p7wEIGM1+6aX6m7BA2vcmk9/gpDbC1Yt2dFwXAryprNBkPB+tFOShKD61
         t+HKA2IqOR55KMfDYnVav8O/TO2FAyQRsghL2yt02h0IrEQ1CQIdApo6DLOdKTgh+8Y3
         tBeQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.135.214 with SMTP id r83mr16733173ioi.13.1432379770942;
 Sat, 23 May 2015 04:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.159.81 with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F37EDAC2-C881-452D-86B1-A5B9BCF3AE3D@antarean.org>
References: <robbat2-20150511T030343-086083177Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
	<5550AE30.4060706@nerot.com>
	<CAOnawYo3ahtxThrZO2J-Y7PRW2kWaeC4Dx5d33t4B0ShCJj0dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_kQL1p7oqYLYjLkiOWEJgbbtVAn7A4x9KtHO+2fLGddTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<F37EDAC2-C881-452D-86B1-A5B9BCF3AE3D@antarean.org>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 07:16:10 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: U58-lqn6YbVSmuKvUV_AumW868A
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kPS-gzjfHnNkqYyGJkkZMkr1WS1bqj=rXcBdt6Ajfa4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 437e14ec-d45b-45c3-9184-8d3579ca57a9
X-Archives-Hash: 66418849497cf6f91a39d50b1484d467

On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 2:18 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org> wrote:
> On 11 May 2015 15:59:40 CEST, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>>I'd REALLY like to see a FOSS alternative to Gmail (a good one, that
>>is), and ditto for Google docs (or whatever the latest branding for
>>that is). There is nothing magical about cloud-based services any more
>>than there is anything magical about letting somebody else host your
>>website.  The key is to ensure that the technologies are open so that
>>you aren't bound to a single provider.
>
> Rich,
>
> If you are thinking of a FOSS email provider. Maybe investigate Fastmail?
>
> They use postfix and cyrus. And they also handle a lot of the development of the latter.
>

My mail all goes through my own postfix server and POP/IMAP server
before it gets to Gmail, and I already have an alternative solution
for outbound SMTP for this server.

I was talking about a decent FOSS browser-based MUA.  The only ones
I'm aware of are Roundcube and Squirrelmail, and neither supports
keyboard shortcuts or tag-based mail as far as I'm aware.  Actually,
I'm not aware of any FOSS IMAP implementation that supports tagging -
that is an email can be in more than one "folder" at the same time.
But, I haven't looked too closely into that since without an MUA it
isn't terribly useful.

-- 
Rich