From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-52040-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SZY8j-00062J-3j
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 01:55:57 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC7B3E072C;
Wed, 30 May 2012 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42166E05BE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 01:55:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so4341636bkc.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 18:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=PNIuEFTQyxXuVujmtx5xayRO3WEq3GhrorEYRuiu7nY=;
b=l4+IH8SMn2jbO5SHyy9Jz30gJ4OWQB7RnJLgT/wCf0I/gNZycr9nHT3zloyRjazt3i
YAwA8Dc+MwErZ+6ZpWTYA1wfuwfie22NFkMn7YvO+STFUMOJT6rVHeV7rM7pW6S8QjtM
LOXQQHyawnQ155FCehXpLhK5PhjuA0fbBnWR18phUthEsCw2I68jmuUkOwFBWVLminzq
n4KiSC0tetiAlScwgZbJqlUGNakoiEORkPHkCWDXv7Mi7wpFucMR9fTnJBuLB1oK9GYk
1qqmLEk5xuolMYQXNIIdJ+ciVUNfOLyhkIw8XZIOLvL2jGauXsIyaIj4sJGCzFSlenkV
Mi8g==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.205.133.7 with SMTP id hw7mr7775283bkc.123.1338342904344; Tue,
29 May 2012 18:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.190.79 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 18:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ddd8ff651a1f5d00ea13fbd9e105ddfa@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org>
<ddd8ff651a1f5d00ea13fbd9e105ddfa@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:55:04 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: gaZEpxQW7xabSBsvbL6JHLTkHS8
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kOCDZ6Ur37+YYx4DR+1b3c-VWE6eNiefS7HJbqtuKKJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 180587b2-c627-4318-afe9-56749f4c16e4
X-Archives-Hash: 37503fb420393c47931ef3a1cac8e317
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Since most of us want "clean cut" solution so i will close bug #333699 as
> WONTFIX
Along these lines, I'm looking at 333531 (the git migration tracker),
and it seems like there isn't actually much to do:
333685 - Seems like no action, and not sure how critical
333687 - while the bug is still open, as far as I can tell it seems
good enough to me to move forward
333697 - ditto
333701 - paused since there are other tasks to do first, though it
seems to me that little remains
333705 - not sure how critical this actually is - do we care if in
some obscure case history is lost? Nothing says that we have to
completely destroy the old cvs repo. Maybe we should just do a mock
migration now and post copies of the before/after somewhere public and
let people have at them.
333709 - seems like there is legitimate work to be done here, but
again nothing that big
So, what is the big issue? Is there something not being tracked, or
is one of those items a lot harder than it looks?
Rich