From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7184C13877A for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A742DE08E8; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:53:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com (mail-vc0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11FEE08E0 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hy4so2542263vcb.19 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=nsA7SMLQAgX52ftPt0WIoYUgHITBTqareNOsU/iSDuE=; b=r1Nvc9faQrnKfX+NFOzwWHTjuRYu82HJrx1mDsXqOJb/4mABFmP/YtVgMB9Z3uUSyF OoElbUuklNerD1/4VBZkv0Pc+Po1z0CzxyY43IkHt9aJOhDtBv0bVoXMlKlIFc7/E2a/ FQ7VKszPzftar5004EX1UB/3Rl4OQuD4P6igx3tWHB7uin4YK64LLsbR3QaHoyxFWBdL /w/cAcSQMulDTBggCageAMpq1nKSymRnkIPx4ullLdSk8E+GXlSiqkQV7l8wLpWwKa48 SyDmMTHFPQDtEi0eSwgROYVXITuNmFRZjxWSQA9gYHFTSaHr5q5CVZewF2lZj0QIxF27 70BA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.185.39 with SMTP id ez7mr4430815vdc.7.1403200431768; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.30.227 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140619170311.GA11784@linux1> References: <20140619170311.GA11784@linux1> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 13:53:51 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 53zUvpQ-n3qRCCH-m79YG-2nOro Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass vs EAPI For Utility Functions (Patching/etc) From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: b738972f-d787-4ee0-93de-7a8a526f7345 X-Archives-Hash: 07c26332981dbd897fb24f930cd5d889 On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > Hi all: > > I am strongly in favor of the eapi-based approach as well, for all of > the reasons mentioned in the thread so far. Good thing your proxy got it right then! :) http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20140617-summary.txt Rich