From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57290-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8C31383B6
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:34:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B005E058E;
	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A71AE05DB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:33:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fp12so123869lab.27
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:33:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=3nM5lT6KiGK2IvbSAiGE2gN0oWphCJEy1M0EZbalroU=;
        b=0xYJbucSLklC2f0Fxqu4uGByjsHmnTncFCVdRVAKxGlE2d/Y3kE6MGvcYD4yV0mFaL
         J7jFHEkUyReYj6Wheb4bwXfghesc6fjOZ0vvEGvM8CvLD8E/xXvGZ1Squ5Fqg+wM5APv
         nZ32GoIEZcajgoPgfW09gE8LrQlTAW3CgnG8OCJ5B89XTT8CRvrbtrdjSdKZm8h0Msq9
         5pnIl7eNUz+gnYiahrPOB+95AZZPm0/IphCSdacLSE3oqyGdORpnQ8zu+untUMN6mxhv
         uhUeBN8ID4vfY2oikB/+VfEADbseC721jvDdGUBivOk1qI9ynVEczzRF6Jsz4MUFMWHe
         yYOg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.113.165 with SMTP id iz5mr12176493lab.50.1357792422826;
 Wed, 09 Jan 2013 20:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.14.37 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:33:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50EE41DB.8050403@gmx.com>
References: <20130109221310.GA1749@linux1>
	<50EE41DB.8050403@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:33:42 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: r4kG0M_Hk9QtvCbLE-QowVGMdSI
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_kDaZ3A8UfRzyz=Eap8-brnz+8RT=0jUpMhE4_aiHma-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 2d88d9df-eb30-44b4-bd6e-38fe83aba9c3
X-Archives-Hash: f2adfa42bb37480c4f8bc699669f6ca0

On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell@gmx.com> wrote:
> So long as users retain the choice of keeping eth* or wlan*, no
> complaints from me. I (and others) came to Gentoo to get away from
> systemd, and this smells of a systemd-ism. Will eudev be pursuing this
> as well?

Keep in mind that this is a udev announcement, not a eudev
announcement.  Udev is generally going to follow upstream, so if
avoiding systemd is your main goal in life you probably will want to
stick with eudev, which might or might not adopt this feature.

You might want to take discussion of eudev planned features to its
dedicated list.

Rich