From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SaPVl-0008P8-Ni for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:55:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85437E06B7; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA500E055B for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so1947544bkc.40 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:54:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SEuiW5PPer7CCqFK2ZF82tG95WsJLzerTrPxsuLMu6Q=; b=lc27L16CUlhhtPwMQp7t25c3DJH/jkwA1eQk69DEIeWJbxrjB7385to9aCZp70afP/ kyDJ8hxvYTL7VrOvJY1iwjvNQe5xkZaygjYuK2+HCV/mWc1da2pPP58S582BaFpqLc/J PwC0exi89tunon5flpf2r8HW2TAXLerpE+519HuWFIpso4oTISlNuJiESw29koyyYOTR VuGxA5E9LUyHrMhSEKp4tc3Pg1BuQ7Zy35k/jVF/jUgO3DhAG80dt5Djo7Av4oFSbNy8 ohp4nyWlMHYYRA4QIwG4Tf6lqnMPp9lL1nETrz3UFh637ZboP3WYZvG63AZGLt6GURR5 EVaw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.141.9 with SMTP id k9mr1242231bku.138.1338548044674; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.149.211 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 03:54:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120531191804.GA24784@linux1> <20120531213303.57529c85@pomiocik.lan> <79847e2567d341102303362662063b0d@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:54:04 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: R7r1HL2BdoM2FP7LFgpqZXPduFI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 3f03ee2e-97b0-44a5-b925-01a11c0aec2f X-Archives-Hash: 7f4ae09808b3dbc74cf0a516f7de6ce3 On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > Hmm, thats annoying. Almost makes me wish it was the trees that were > signed, not the commits. I think it is the tree that is signed, but that changes too. Rebasing re-applies the same diff to the new head to give you a new set of commits. When you apply the same diff to a different parent you end up with a different tree, so the tree signature won't be the same either. Keep in mind that git does not store a long train of diffs. It stores a long chain of complete trees, and the diffs get calculated if you ask for them. Since it is COW you only re-store files that actually change, and incorporate others by reference. However, if you have a 1MB file that you change 1 line on 100x, you'll end up with 100MB of files. Of course, when they get packed I'd hope that they'd compress well. Rich