From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66483-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3C113877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:33:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15EFBE08D9;
Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:33:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25CD6E08A8
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:33:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id la4so130168vcb.14
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 05:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type;
bh=mg7qRuv9DZndd3ft2sk9A4fEYaA5O8I9yJclFXCSvRc=;
b=Ypw8cdsne5LcLjWHPUH5aPJDJvG6QfFbPUjoyHH9Vkfoi5P3+TsS6OnF3nMZg/E+Z0
AWOOIU0sgRIQs6IWVFkvat9ZiUcdegn00/5vQvCCLgI+xwd+eObT3g7kinnu3h9iBkwD
aDwxTKxdPazmW/ab2PkFIe1e4XDHufW4FaAtqVVT+Wp9Y2iPQEVSNuOk+KamTpwvN7GD
NclUSlYp991L8F/4pEH9ov1p/bh/RuEfPV4F5u8GkI0Zsd9fEVDsg8+hMhAUElElzCPY
l4Fe9DpS/k8ShfwfOUcyqA0pCx8dF+mBsAjjn1cOYpDKm9ucfGiUF7OTJ48aWg/r++k7
yAGQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.112.65 with SMTP id io1mr107881veb.61.1404390821020; Thu,
03 Jul 2014 05:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.72.19 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 05:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140703120728.19262.qmail@stuge.se>
References: <53AB007C.5070306@gentoo.org>
<20140703125812.7b799fb4@pomiot.lan>
<20140703120728.19262.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 08:33:40 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aPWTztDsmVzaYp6A10PRN8uJ0XI
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_k8ubzo-z5JqeMHtrhF4jkuaCDLEVdokxFjx0FrO6SiEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: ac469463-e66d-4d1c-afce-12ea7222db77
X-Archives-Hash: 990fe6062bb18e5a5e6b758bb646508e
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote:
> This can't work; abi/x86 can't be both a file and a subdir.
Profiles ARE subdirs. Most of our existing profiles are stacked in
this way. This would become less-so if we went with the mix-in
approach, but it wouldn't be entirely flat in this proposal.
Rich