From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C841386B2 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A0F421C056; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5F621C04D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w33so2208399iag.27 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:13:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7sLlhmobrTG9Cfk9IufS05rSGvWbdE6ncAsRkA2muMM=; b=s5Fh+x3HFHMbM6dts6Lzns4g/Zvrc3Iokmhdm9g9dbGv2XwqasioIU18PPD5RvP0kK 9vGHvjauWHvC0SRV7nRm4tQaiynopHNvy4TYJs9a5zh+X2MXFjY0w8owjUFVjILs4/Oq mUXiL8RH9ul3goWnr2KcywirnKThglvywHoAhFQ6yqYR/LQ9+6z1aUa2w8do+9XAL7to cN+GTo4VFqbCG0KUHduHAVp61UTuNI6U6JQaTH3gI7gi+Gx0HNngnU5uEmH2+UmMCTMZ HMKTaJ+1ra1pbTYM0+aI7Y34/7Ke5sZ4P0pezRItbK7JkuRDtM+HO8aY91qejterVFgT gG5g== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.213.42 with SMTP id np10mr1372994igc.47.1359216832529; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:13:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.30.231 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:13:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5103FDC9.7040603@flameeyes.eu> References: <201301251851.45021.vapier@gentoo.org> <1359159053.32487.4.camel@kanae> <201301260246.12861.vapier@gentoo.org> <5103FDC9.7040603@flameeyes.eu> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:13:52 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Gnv2b6RUfC7VwnMFIyrrI3NqJ6o Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to the tree From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 2ed96887-3288-4ad0-9bae-e5f8a5b145b2 X-Archives-Hash: 7a580c8c2bcce63b13db32bdc2dc1bfe On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Diego Elio Petten=F2 wrote: > > There's also a different kind of capabilities, in theory, relating to > users instead and using PAM =97 but I never got to get it working :( I naively assumed that if you edit /etc/security/capability.conf this would set the per-user capabilities. However, I have not actually tried this. I guess our pam configuration/etc isn't set to check this file? Rich