From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57978-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C841386B2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:14:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A0F421C056;
	Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:14:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ia0-f182.google.com (mail-ia0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5F621C04D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:13:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ia0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w33so2208399iag.27
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:13:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=7sLlhmobrTG9Cfk9IufS05rSGvWbdE6ncAsRkA2muMM=;
        b=s5Fh+x3HFHMbM6dts6Lzns4g/Zvrc3Iokmhdm9g9dbGv2XwqasioIU18PPD5RvP0kK
         9vGHvjauWHvC0SRV7nRm4tQaiynopHNvy4TYJs9a5zh+X2MXFjY0w8owjUFVjILs4/Oq
         mUXiL8RH9ul3goWnr2KcywirnKThglvywHoAhFQ6yqYR/LQ9+6z1aUa2w8do+9XAL7to
         cN+GTo4VFqbCG0KUHduHAVp61UTuNI6U6JQaTH3gI7gi+Gx0HNngnU5uEmH2+UmMCTMZ
         HMKTaJ+1ra1pbTYM0+aI7Y34/7Ke5sZ4P0pezRItbK7JkuRDtM+HO8aY91qejterVFgT
         gG5g==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.213.42 with SMTP id np10mr1372994igc.47.1359216832529;
 Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:13:52 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.30.231 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:13:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5103FDC9.7040603@flameeyes.eu>
References: <201301251851.45021.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<1359159053.32487.4.camel@kanae>
	<201301260246.12861.vapier@gentoo.org>
	<5103FDC9.7040603@flameeyes.eu>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:13:52 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Gnv2b6RUfC7VwnMFIyrrI3NqJ6o
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_k6B-8F3p2NrR8weQwG+2wRz2VZOz_UdrwhptyK099pjw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fcaps.eclass: bringing filesystem capabilities to
 the tree
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 2ed96887-3288-4ad0-9bae-e5f8a5b145b2
X-Archives-Hash: 7a580c8c2bcce63b13db32bdc2dc1bfe

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Diego Elio Petten=F2
<flameeyes@flameeyes.eu> wrote:
>
> There's also a different kind of capabilities, in theory, relating to
> users instead and using PAM =97 but I never got to get it working :(

I naively assumed that if you edit /etc/security/capability.conf this
would set the per-user capabilities.  However, I have not actually
tried this.  I guess our pam configuration/etc isn't set to check this
file?

Rich