From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:10:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_k3ODWqeUmB6vS8e+-sJEeqQ==SO2pxTb99=zphhtq28A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140702195437.09c8efdb@pomiot.lan>
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without
> understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are
> only few people who have any idea about the current profile
> structure...
No argument there.
We may very well still end up with something hierarchical, but we can
at least limit that to the parts of the profile where it matters.
Maybe x86/BSD and amd64/Linux and amd64/Linux-hardened need to be
interdependent. However, that still gets rid of need to deal with
desktop environments, init systems, arguments over what belongs in
@system, and so on. We could have a blocker mechanism to keep people
from mixing systemd with BSD, or we could just let people shoot
themselves in the foot.
Sounds like a good time to start reverse engineering the profiles...
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-02 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-02 15:44 [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins William Hubbs
2014-07-02 17:54 ` Michał Górny
2014-07-02 18:10 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2014-07-02 18:32 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-02 18:35 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-02 18:41 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2014-07-02 19:07 ` Anthony G. Basile
2014-07-02 19:19 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2014-07-02 19:30 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-03 14:55 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-07-03 23:09 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-07-03 23:35 ` Rich Freeman
2014-07-03 6:18 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-07-03 7:00 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2014-07-03 8:47 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-07-03 16:06 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-07-03 8:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2014-07-03 9:01 ` Martin Vaeth
2014-07-03 7:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2014-07-03 8:21 ` Joshua Kinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGfcS_k3ODWqeUmB6vS8e+-sJEeqQ==SO2pxTb99=zphhtq28A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=williamh@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox