public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:27:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_k+ABLfEEK_150S_znc7Pvf6Q1ATakoLa-n4oEsbMLA+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201111211314.20292.dilfridge@gentoo.org>

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
<dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I would like to avoid the situation that we all file stable requests like mad and end up with all-but-one swamped arch teams and a neverending list of open stabilization bugs waiting for the last arch.

I think that this is something worth trying to mitigate in some way
(maybe only file them for the archs that wish to participate).
However, I don't think we want the stable x86/amd64 experience to be
dictated primarily by the size of the smallest minor arch team (among
those we stabilize).

Rich



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21  8:41 [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-21 11:48 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-11-21 12:14 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-11-21 12:24   ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-21 12:27   ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2011-11-21 13:12 ` James Broadhead
2011-11-21 15:47 ` Brian Dolbec
2011-11-23 14:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Torsten Veller
2011-11-24 15:17   ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-24 16:35     ` Ian Stakenvicius
2011-11-24 17:12       ` Rich Freeman
2011-11-24 17:26         ` Pacho Ramos
2011-11-29 12:18         ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-11-25 16:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kahle
2011-11-25 19:06   ` Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
2011-11-29 12:17   ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 10:42 ` justin
2011-12-16 11:06   ` Agostino Sarubbo
2011-12-16 11:10     ` Anthony G. Basile
2011-12-16 11:21       ` Agostino Sarubbo
2011-12-16 11:46         ` justin
2011-12-18 10:59           ` [gentoo-dev] checking C*FLAGS used for build (was: making the stable tree more up-to-date) Michał Górny
2011-12-16 11:07   ` [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date Brian Harring
2011-12-16 13:27   ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 13:53     ` Rich Freeman
2011-12-16 14:05       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2011-12-16 18:40         ` Tim Harder
2011-12-16 14:12     ` justin
2011-12-17 15:25       ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGfcS_k+ABLfEEK_150S_znc7Pvf6Q1ATakoLa-n4oEsbMLA+Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox