From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8073E138334 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 22:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05A6DE095D; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 22:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com (mail-pf0-f169.google.com [209.85.192.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63C52E0928 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 22:01:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c21-v6so7574793pfn.8 for ; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tg6wVygbkBmYqPEn43R2zm18dRA28W4/u/TkLTXpuc8=; b=hRwtmf/11YU2tC8djuZ4ukXW64Md6oFGtSq5OLNuhKOEZfQ+2Nlp9nn3L0yrLfFcGJ bDRqcQYQToB3IL0g/yCN3jc9Z9YEs8ikxJ0GWMSOpop0RqWe13RrwGflVl1SPF9H6hUT h+itorD/UDQ2VzmpVjqiFne6E9yPCHdkfszilKpyHKHnzbLC/ZQ/9X/3uhHBd2mYYvT6 F+7jqX0TOhd8zIUya3ZfL438EkDJcHhf9bPZkVaj39B71X1tPWRl3BWUnbrYrxZDpYR2 zTB+CrDXM4Ae/B7EXmPDq6mZQzSvCEM+TTnR87ICKBeO1HBcfQfTKcK12AzS33uqAgd8 NN7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E27zCCVIhtJKOxSvdHCJW35Q4RG5MVNOsd9/SA17QHfKoHQkUFb PDx6ULwVoAW1ink5A4Otc/3odq4hSre9Oiwj12V0rw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdj7pYARPEpltAuRhcC2HZWT5KiQe+l9an9N+Ue5C2VGoI2Lg7/Amwt5qQ2+JNgtngLmI+/w5s1rynbQ+1nlA8= X-Received: by 2002:a62:d8c:: with SMTP id 12-v6mr17487643pfn.202.1531087264966; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 15:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7594901D-54AF-4100-A1B8-7CEA2D1CC82D@gentoo.org> <1339caeb-06fc-c28b-2bd1-2186b0d25f5a@gentoo.org> <1531058219.1553.1.camel@gentoo.org> <1531075350.1553.9.camel@gentoo.org> <853058f4-5634-672a-3655-c9a2ece014e7@gentoo.org> <1531080494.10985.0.camel@gentoo.org> <9d259064-4908-0c86-b207-b695ec266bb7@gentoo.org> <1531084701.10985.1.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: From: Rich Freeman Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 18:00:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage rsync hardlink support To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 9a173239-7164-4563-819e-24f348ee66e6 X-Archives-Hash: af0a6345d6730ad2cb4f840dc2303b57 On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 5:50 PM Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > > Does Portage not call attention to critical updates? > > It used to make a special statement for a new stable Portage and strongly recommended that it be emerged first. It should probably do the same for openpgp-keys-gentoo-release. If that is only needed for syncing, then I'm not sure there is really a need. If you have the ebuild for the latest keys, then you can install them in any order at any time. If you don't have the ebuild but need it, then portage won't know, and syncing will simply fail unless overridden somehow. -- Rich