From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E661387FD for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBF2FE0E68; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19F0E0E60 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ik5so1112033vcb.14 for ; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:34:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=s/5zTZ1bds5uOcZTcAMdnaV3ThQadejl6rlMOFvBLqQ=; b=SZQdkPausjm5BcbSpAclVb0Am9PVI853CxiNNY5ThIGay13dNoEDD/uPIO+6Kvy9Vi PRGIKz38YVDC5Yg8H5DatH0sKSkjbvSwdoMG4Jl5mrCuU+6YTwau9nNHuGbbpFn3RiTA KacUEdMkyEGKEHB23OjN7JeuQsSRM/GRDI1GJLXGp9wGusStDCT1GUPGrEmmzh4Hs6sx CDO5o7qM2v/2KTAsmIkOG5zh3zLDFT+r0ZrFPLZH51YJzEB5U3dZTcoVbORkPZBtOQfj KG9v8VTIpokPcYNKCC1eSP6TBXJZkagGyzG5hrcu1qMM3pgGmcyGH4ndnuTqOx4GfPXK rAoA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.51.226 with SMTP id n2mr2968001vdo.57.1396470855806; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 13:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.29.142 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:34:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <533C6DF8.4060301@gentoo.org> References: <5335EE26.1010606@gentoo.org> <53364874.9050603@gentoo.org> <53388280.4010105@gentoo.org> <53390215.80604@gentoo.org> <5339D180.2010309@gentoo.org> <533A5328.1000607@gentoo.org> <533AAFCF.9070600@gentoo.org> <20140401172803.219a51fe@gentoo.org> <533AE17C.3070605@gentoo.org> <20140401183844.6980c898@gentoo.org> <533BA773.10901@gentoo.org> <533C6DF8.4060301@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:34:15 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y0nHyFVtE8KQi25cl4f9MTzH9LQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals for libudev and libgudev From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 3f1b65fd-c08a-4920-9c2c-5ed2d4819fad X-Archives-Hash: 998bae2ee6ebd6fa22da5ff14e4be220 (picking this email to reply to, but it isn't mean to single anybody out) On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > Wow, now that I can see it your way I agree, I'm a horrible person. > I'll stick to randomly changing the tree as I see fit with no discussion > since forced discussion is so wrong. This kind of bickering isn't going to solve anything. Unfortunately somebody is going to have to let somebody else have the last word... The situation is apparently with Comrel and they can deal with the specifics. Issues involving specific people are rarely best handled on public lists. Clarifying some of the policies involved is already on the radar of the Council and QA, and I expect there to be progress on both fronts. I don't want to rehash everything else again, so... Rich