From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11775138330 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1E0EE0C2B; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF99E0BC4 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z17so1018430pgc.4 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:20:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=TS8oLBT/WvBNEaarLET6ccXes6fOgsFqh0PBYsf+s2s=; b=jlwhumQ1e/aktjeNzrkeYqcTbTkfxWly9x1WrBBCzXShemckpi6rv0ri5sm/zxScWX iOE0rbFyPs+/XIEWGqLEvLziR9VQWp6dRyKhmR+x1B00qg24BaftLb+lRGh4rr3j0oXi lrTLFMgNukbp/K66zyoheJFvP+kLRefJCzHAIkkTCOUnHE+1NusqqLDb/HhBoGUF/QwW OB8uIAlMsiklJpYA58P/SYDuhHv3N+zgUkQx2v2XWlJYGrh96McH3pAGtny1gil+dBqy IuzkRR1N6gf8shA4h4F5WZzsLIZmKrEmoyBcdTZ4zHERITfsD8yQgIpH1KkfUzQtysNT Erow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TS8oLBT/WvBNEaarLET6ccXes6fOgsFqh0PBYsf+s2s=; b=mJdZEl2BtoHphCgStGKGL/qwp+140EcqHF9VewMSd4q00SaCJFJrt4fUl3vGcSsMLB ob5r2irjwSZx4cQuYjmUJ21gvrK06SKpVR1m3PWxaiWsHDknrQhJFOfTd4ozCJ6NWMHb V+5Ep3xfabJPDMGvFgVg3mSHAiMeV431hyXpBtUI4ctmZVLWbuRuhJ6bhGqJ3Ayv/rIS 8kNdQ5eyN47AbZGMLu3nJe7lDjVsnDvQYsslVOgU4z0HFA5tA+Qcl0tnaEshrkK6HyXf LKxs+o9ihMYb1WAUPd0+oPJ8mwBA6F6VNFhxGGbaIghABEXAbFIfMV+9y17s6FddYUle NP2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKsODXYFNKu4oHF1gr4htXbECdDnEOqKSb6YPNbRCbrnj8V5NGH tO00mMElHGdku8RlP6yZ7bWfk4otQt6FZyWBUz2nrd8n X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotkCEXjN4+UiE4noe/oeWg7jpAd/v0zsqvmKziDgWslbFyz7eNQLDXzeD0XfuiiUyR7Kk8Q83Ok2Rv7UosECVc= X-Received: by 10.84.246.21 with SMTP id k21mr20969132pll.174.1515626447637; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:20:47 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.151.169 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:20:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1685019.DAF74n7IXa@pinacolada> From: Rich Freeman Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:20:47 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DtMeu6yajvB5rs-Br9PhrBUvNSk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: a6edbacb-35ad-40af-8126-19f52262360a X-Archives-Hash: 99f7bf4f817c8455805851799456d4f0 On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Roy Bamford wrote: > > Being somwhat old and cynical, I'm seeing signs of history > repeating itself. > > Does being 'struck off' the list in this way apply to devs, including > Council and comrel members? > It would seem that this question is already answered: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council/Code_of_conduct#Consequences Being banned from lists or removal of dev status (which would also remove posting privs unless whitelisted) are already listed as potential consequences for refusal to comply with the CoC. -- Rich