public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:14:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=knNjJAbNayxGbh1dXgUbEKfpk55QP=QFqJebO+Hzy2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110918165851.020d8fb0@googlemail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 968 bytes --]

On Sep 18, 2011 12:05 PM, "Ciaran McCreesh" <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:20:34 +0000
> "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > As we're talking about updating profiles EAPI, what do we need to get
> > to be able to mask use flags for the stable tree, but not the testing
> > tree?
>
> Every time this has come up, the conclusion has been "it's a horrible
> idea from a QA perspective, since it would mean that testing something
> in ~arch would be different to testing it in arch".
>

Isn't that already true from a dependency standpoint?  I do see your point,
but the concept of rolling out a risky flag to the brave first does make
sense.

I think the biggest issue with ~arch is when things get deployed there for a
very long time before hitting stable. That applies to libraries,
baselayout-2, or flags. Things shouldn't go to ~arch unless we have a plan
to make them stable (excepting one-offs).

Rich

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1243 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-18 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4E64C7BB.907@gentoo.org>
     [not found] ` <CA+Nrkpd499zUJiHee2f9wfoCgRiQCO0EXetowbPdWYmMGoaFkA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-07  9:07   ` [gentoo-dev] Fwd: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for items for September 13 council meeting Tomáš Chvátal
2011-09-07  9:17     ` Andreas K. Hüttel
2011-09-07 13:21     ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-09-07 14:27       ` Tomáš Chvátal
2011-09-07 15:43         ` Michał Górny
2011-09-07 15:48     ` Michał Górny
2011-09-07 22:47       ` Aaron W. Swenson
2011-09-07 22:53         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-07 23:04           ` Brian Harring
2011-09-15  7:35           ` Michał Górny
2011-09-15  7:55             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-15  8:01               ` Michał Górny
2011-09-15  8:07                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-15 23:21               ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2011-09-15 23:54                 ` Brian Harring
2011-09-16  0:20                   ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2011-09-16 21:06                     ` Zac Medico
2011-09-18  3:47                       ` Donnie Berkholz
2011-09-18  5:26                         ` Zac Medico
2011-09-18  6:01                           ` Brian Harring
2011-09-18  6:57                           ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-09-18  9:24                           ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-09-18  9:33                             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-18 14:20                               ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2011-09-18 15:58                                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-18 16:14                                   ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2011-09-18 17:10                                 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2011-09-18 17:34                                 ` Zac Medico
2011-09-18 14:47                               ` Michał Górny
2011-09-18 15:54                                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-15 16:51             ` Brian Harring
2011-09-07 16:19     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-08 17:03     ` Thomas Sachau
2011-09-08 17:41       ` Alec Warner
2011-09-08 17:55       ` Ole Markus With
2011-09-08 18:10       ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2011-09-08 18:35         ` Michał Górny
2011-09-08 18:33           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-09-08 18:43             ` Michał Górny
2011-09-09  0:45         ` Mike Frysinger
2011-09-18 11:08       ` proposal for cross-compie support in EAPI-5, was: " Thomas Sachau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGfcS_=knNjJAbNayxGbh1dXgUbEKfpk55QP=QFqJebO+Hzy2g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox