From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-53808-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCA213800E
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:51:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74E34E07AF;
Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:50:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C18E07AB
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:49:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4so1268206bkw.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 04:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=2b8Z1MLTsejMMuaMoAm99Su2tE7Aai+ALOMzGanwqEY=;
b=QKz07U48hueGD0PCMtLN+LCfITLpjnye5HW/Dna4E8nonJIVpdfzYeoocx5cnq88qj
5zofKehzovaAqvWV3CDRWXrxQOzOW1MVlB6/5AYE6bGmy2e8eB5y72TSzE5JzXxQ9+qV
yiShF2h6AK4qle1W6S8HvBGI0LZ04uJpqDKADgt5vtuzO2FcVyZF1OlyJ5EKmThx8ukm
JlqIt57P9nFQ2IspUOjwILwlTvA7p22yBP9Ctxgu1sMO1x1HJYhecmNvS+bMCrOCMepW
dsOEIhQ0GyhZBvs/1vGNq14bHNNKyuDed0F/Zfb82hj1lIWIymQlIpB10h+tXHzX4RfE
tTYg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.129.8 with SMTP id m8mr3916582bks.62.1344253788184; Mon,
06 Aug 2012 04:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.205.82.12 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 04:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120806104208.GH24104@gentoo.org>
References: <501F95A8.6070105@gentoo.org>
<20120806122025.27faf285@pomiocik.lan>
<501F9E83.2010509@gentoo.org>
<20120806104208.GH24104@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 07:49:48 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: XLRXBmenvtU2hQugncI7hWQhlm0
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=ZhduBZHhoreL8e2RbOFoO9fBxRMg0Ld8srTMnhsiahA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] systemd.eclass: Patch for new function systemd_get_udevdir()
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 0249666d-02d4-4028-a5f7-5eb2f6aa1513
X-Archives-Hash: 93fffdcb8a1471fb44ea88d348bb3f91
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 06-08-2012 13:37:55 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> > Also, I'm not so sure if this will work correctly for Prefix.
>>
>> I'm sure that is easily checked and we will get feedback quickly.
>
> I'm sure systemd/udev will never run in (a) Prefix, so perhaps it is
> more sensical not to pseudo-provide support for it.
>
I wouldn't be so quick to make that assumption. Right now openrc
doesn't work on Prefix but there is a SoC project to change that. Why
wouldn't we assume that somebody will do the same for systemd?
Obviously the long-term future of systemd/openrc/alternatives is
unclear now, but that just seems to be all the more reason to keep our
options open.
I'm not suggesting that we fully build-in support for systemd under
Prefix and so on, but rather I'm suggesting that if leaving it open as
an option now saves us a lot of rework later we should consider it.
(And yes, I realize that systemd is currently linux-only and why that
would make any use under Prefix difficult.)
Rich