From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SaPQw-0007jl-B0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:50:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C0C3E0656; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E7FE061F for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so1943493bkc.40 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:49:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b2sij8ccVsgDTt7jOFemuyXlyVqFVsMyVsXKvU7NRG8=; b=KZzpoB9RAitCJhYCgFcVzPVSsHi3bruRZ3av68I8tBUnowhTZ1y73rraRSiQ8Ghv4N sVCE+oLovWrhdEeTusdv0z5ZrVJXhlQp4FpgCHmPSbejUAKNsfaArHk5VQrf6Xqgs2jD F9xWyZI+YSf11v+VDw37qn/D2jCMrsJoXxkNhTg382JyZQwIwPvOM/3eoBO0v6ULC9vq ef/NZLyHCdOxEU1tsoh4pURaxaZUCSYHD7I3P4zhW24i69r4TTP8oyRCNtyDzeNlVCNE RJWzBz8QJCMFokWRtdtBuraIdL108ybPu9aVAsgGBcnbTMaV7VJaQkBBCsUy/inTZmrG AxHQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.152.196 with SMTP id h4mr1284168bkw.131.1338547740639; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.149.211 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 03:49:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120601060526.50cb1155@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120531191804.GA24784@linux1> <20120531213303.57529c85@pomiocik.lan> <20120531220959.0a33f183@pomiocik.lan> <4FC7D444.4080009@orlitzky.com> <20120601060526.50cb1155@pomiocik.lan> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:49:00 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dKOj_Mtu4juZkqbSwI5lXcM_QWE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: michael@orlitzky.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 6f510cd1-6186-4033-8169-edc188f20b1a X-Archives-Hash: 2c38a22c5f038ab4fbb55af7f0724ab6 On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny = wrote: > Yes, it isn't but such kind of work flow was presented in the message I > replied to. Yup, I wasn't aware that when rebasing you have the option to squash commits or not. They all get rewritten as if they were applied to the current head in the first place, but apparently unless you squash them you still get all the individual commits. Rich