From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B1F1381F3 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEC6021C005; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (mail-bk0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A43721C0DA for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j4so1986036bkw.6 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:23:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G+y2IR5LYbkanlShxxzgQsdwmQmF5IddM7OI5oieHJE=; b=Dk7qRfTxKIMwu4HZJ3kMo/rZHYt3xzpNc4Jldjpy6UKtMTWS4w7NYm+fo1143CMIJh 6f+9jUJmkDn5CRU8vFEchrByoFSqrGTjx44A8o9drz8hQrBqS8TffjU5YEItk1NGw3uu IkHS3WU0C4rzrx95EXJsguG8CEcjjGfqorQByFxvrk4BD6COenwr1XummXFw5gzsZA75 wx0TtT8jmCp48K3yL1mrCCtxjff6Z/IvTm5jHo5YePt47c5MD5QbtFYw2nGQxKJGlYNh OcN3neEQqWOGl+5IluILnRitgQ2UH2v+QyTOCbdltfRbSxGgSBVABMS2yFviAhSf+r25 s9yg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.11.208 with SMTP id u16mr5399323bku.81.1356038639639; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:23:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.12.28 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:23:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50D37909.2030406@gentoo.org> References: <20691.19070.847806.983953@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <50D35249.1090608@gentoo.org> <20691.21794.717209.574564@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <50D356B6.2090602@gentoo.org> <50D37909.2030406@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:23:59 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: swMvPVRxYRwmsiNNnCoGIPebgM0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping licenses around From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: f742b8af-3748-426d-b89f-abd5d9f0dee3 X-Archives-Hash: ad565606f3ac5f196fdb93d3e0003bc6 On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > > If only a small subset of licenses require it, then maybe we should just > use dodoc on those licenses that require it. Saving all licenses could > be overkill. Seems like a reasonable compromise. I would think such licenses would be rare. I still think it is extralegal to try to require this, but some would rather not take risks and I can appreciate that... Rich