* [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
@ 2012-02-19 11:30 Pacho Ramos
2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2012-02-19 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
Hello
You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773
Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if
patches fix the problems and commit them.
Thanks a lot :-)
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
2012-02-19 11:30 [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed Pacho Ramos
@ 2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
2012-02-20 19:38 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sterrett @ 2012-02-20 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that
use it (some, optionally).
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hello
>
> You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
> 2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773
>
> Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
> report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
> then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if
> patches fix the problems and commit them.
>
> Thanks a lot :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
@ 2012-02-20 19:38 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-02-20 20:05 ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2012-02-20 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1108 bytes --]
El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 13:09 -0500, Michael Sterrett escribió:
> Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib? There are only 46 ebuilds that
> use it (some, optionally).
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
> > 2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773
> >
> > Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
> > report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
> > then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if
> > patches fix the problems and commit them.
> >
> > Thanks a lot :-)
>
>
The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided
patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them
without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to
commit them as I cannot even test them at build time due being x86
specific).
Also, looks like upstream is dead, but some distributions are still
providing it :-/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
2012-02-20 19:38 ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2012-02-20 20:05 ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rich Freeman @ 2012-02-20 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided
> patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them
> without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to
> commit them as I cannot even test them at build time due being x86
> specific).
It seems to me that the package still needs a maintainer. That could
be a developer, or a proxy-maintainer if one of those users wants to
commit to tending it. If nobody wants to step up, and the package is
buggy, then treecleaning is the only recourse.
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-20 20:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-19 11:30 [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed Pacho Ramos
2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
2012-02-20 19:38 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-02-20 20:05 ` Rich Freeman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox