public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
@ 2012-02-19 11:30 Pacho Ramos
  2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2012-02-19 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]

Hello

You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773

Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if
patches fix the problems and commit them.

Thanks a lot :-)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
  2012-02-19 11:30 [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed Pacho Ramos
@ 2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
  2012-02-20 19:38   ` Pacho Ramos
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sterrett @ 2012-02-20 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib?  There are only 46 ebuilds that
use it (some, optionally).

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hello
>
> You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
> 2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773
>
> Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
> report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
> then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if
> patches fix the problems and commit them.
>
> Thanks a lot :-)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
  2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
@ 2012-02-20 19:38   ` Pacho Ramos
  2012-02-20 20:05     ` Rich Freeman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2012-02-20 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1108 bytes --]

El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 13:09 -0500, Michael Sterrett escribió:
> Maybe it's time to just punt svgalib?  There are only 46 ebuilds that
> use it (some, optionally).
> 
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > You can see current opened bugs for svgalib here:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=media-libs%
> > 2Fsvgalib;list_id=812773
> >
> > Most of them already contain a patch that is supposed to fix each bug
> > report, the problem is that svgalib doesn't build at all on amd64 and,
> > then, would be interesting if anybody with a x86 system could check if
> > patches fix the problems and commit them.
> >
> > Thanks a lot :-)
> 
> 

The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided
patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them
without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to
commit them as I cannot even test them at build time due being x86
specific). 

Also, looks like upstream is dead, but some distributions are still
providing it :-/

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed
  2012-02-20 19:38   ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2012-02-20 20:05     ` Rich Freeman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rich Freeman @ 2012-02-20 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> The problem is that users CCed on their bug reports have provided
> patches and fixes for them and would probably get angry if we punt them
> without even applying the patches to the tree (but I don't want to
> commit them as I cannot even test them at build time due being x86
> specific).

It seems to me that the package still needs a maintainer.  That could
be a developer, or a proxy-maintainer if one of those users wants to
commit to tending it.  If nobody wants to step up, and the package is
buggy, then treecleaning is the only recourse.

Rich



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-20 20:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-19 11:30 [gentoo-dev] Help on getting media-libs/svgalib fixed Pacho Ramos
2012-02-20 18:09 ` Michael Sterrett
2012-02-20 19:38   ` Pacho Ramos
2012-02-20 20:05     ` Rich Freeman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox