From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51922-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SXa2Y-0003je-4N
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:33:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3311CE081E;
Thu, 24 May 2012 15:33:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1323E0760
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:32:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so8134319bkc.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 08:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=mOxOIaVWsjSEbJWXjC3N9GtzSHveFnAWrlfb7XXKKF8=;
b=Nx3xnnrdEoLHU9NZUhXWT73b3UgDLPW6p/sCj9KhsTBMo1dytg8RVfK0WNh7DnOuBN
V1sDaY3Z0Z57n6CocF70jW4O1wsf5GA/66dHgguqEjIXSu2Bo+VHVbfvRWs9LWBExw6a
J1kfjzKOrP3svAoc2f+1tZ4A/DZcP+WFhs4hic6Yv0LEc/zdmBoHVoQXpqNXJoDjT9ry
FzVw0fTGaDjIj38fPCsFsIVUI+5AJ7F8o+UfeAy90kZKoqL8EoJnm982qDFujJ2NFM9x
cYTAcfJcLeV4W5FXmOUFosNm1BMcHGQoDmWVTqgIjPYhUIgrl8OkvT9JZR4XHP12rkKE
Llgw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.128.201 with SMTP id l9mr13818438bks.68.1337873538918;
Thu, 24 May 2012 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.190.79 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120524170224.728c194e@sera-17.lan>
References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org>
<robbat2-20120523T164346-726762549Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
<1473095.PKeReGjyol@smorgbox>
<4FBD5B42.7090809@gentoo.org>
<CAATnKFCx0P+0nTP1B6LC+LDektPxqRoUCsR9jAJZx9WfV080hQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20120524164002.50092941@pomiocik.lan>
<20120524170224.728c194e@sera-17.lan>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:32:18 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _orSj_4PjnHGsutHbBLO1KT_6VA
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=JV=f7_X-Jf7cV7J37Kw0wGtyX3jqLia-0s7KK_crH_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: b3d54497-e493-4b80-b650-7f0f94cbdc8a
X-Archives-Hash: 2b44643f82c094b6352a19fd0ff1695c
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please.
>
> Also, there still should be a bug at b.g.o and git format-patch works
> just fine for that. Maybe it's only github now but how many places is a
> developer supposed to monitor?
I'm actually a little torn on this one. I'm fine with keeping the
"master" on Gentoo in the sense that this is where the rsync tree gets
generated. However, gitbub has a lot of tools like pull requests that
could potentially improve workflow, especially for things like proxy
maintainers. So, letting those teams work more outside of Gentoo and
just push their changes into Gentoo might make sense.
Perhaps github should be viewed as a widely-shared overlay that gets
automatic updates from the main tree in the master branch (or whatever
we call it). You can work on a branch in github, get it where you
want it to be, and then push it to Gentoo pretty easily. When I don't
have access to an upstream repository I often just push a copy to a
fork on Github just to make my own life easier.
Rich