From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DAB1383A5 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A1E521C02B; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F1621C001 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 19:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ge1so1340412lbb.26 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:49:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=M2gccjUF9vFtxIyh8WbFDLhXRlsW7esqpiYP3/IQ0lQ=; b=wCXWhI3XaDmgULZ44f85tgPdRMPOgKOny3iMgQd7AYhUXkoSZlyvXU7H9IjpgBRRmh q9Lx9N2DSPZXQaVZF99KCSArSHYACElpmLhCv7wqDcsOhCUnYRhZiHRztzFgAa2D0mdQ RytGP2R9boC2ZNamsNbFJhget+FXqF30ONIrd4/UYqk/trHYGuRMhb94EnqtuYA3oS2O tnaR6TKTWNQ0rFp6lvvF8KRklx49sVTHsNVrJ0CxyDmxLbpPPHKo40TSKrOyKpfe2T9J M9r4g0mo6nQumwyuAx0n47zvUdWsSNnk0yEEXFW05aseYYsAYkXmBLkjX9rk3irLXlmg YiiA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.29.229 with SMTP id n5mr29102545lbh.130.1357760949625; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:49:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.14.37 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:49:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130109180201.57b56cb2@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <50ED9802.3060103@carrosses.com> <20130109180201.57b56cb2@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:49:09 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LbNbnQApQo3k5Nv8vW61lUSY8gY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal From: Rich Freeman To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: d6488b75-0cd3-4ac2-9bab-01cd1991618e X-Archives-Hash: 4b8cd92892a1c2289d783d4aebefa5df On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > A lot clearer than a single text field littered with keywords would be some > tick boxes, indeed. In fact, it makes me wonder why we use a half-obscured list > in a select field for adding/removing arch teams now. Agree - mostly legacy (perhaps due to previous limitations in bugzilla?). Non-arch-specific tested/stable keywords are useless IMHO. Their main purpose is for bug filtering. The concept is that you have a large team of arch testers who can do the testing, and a smaller team of devs with commit access who search for bugs with the appropriate marks and do the commit/close (often with little testing of their own). When only amd64 was doing it the single keyword worked fine. Do we have enough ATs around that this is even worth having any longer? I know that whenever I run my keyworded-but-still-amd64-cc query it is pretty rare for stuff to come up. Years ago that was the arch team bread-and-butter. Rich