From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-85906-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69BE8138334
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4A5DE0DD1;
Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pl1-f170.google.com (mail-pl1-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 537DBE0D83
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:15:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pl1-f170.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so1732346pll.12
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=Cf+GihRTBRS5fWzjgrHVmZqge8DVWl2D1XahfvhsJU4=;
b=R44tKieDmFs9uyImOGVqb8NfUXCqgvUVAYauuZzaf/psnbP7nyWELLO51WMxxoTmxi
uLGWqW0edIK3x7rvl9bJvn/ixV59Ot4SsBVwKMv9Y2nnT0L2fNk9g7Jaav1nW7g/DaA9
E6ueQoD4BbCQ8SjDdvUu3Th668xWBDCeYB+KFUZddxOFKFwSnx9iZ1xLoizQT56rCn+n
JEf8lhtF3QdpR5GsuLTqIRKV3Ad1026Wrbtkxm7p3lhy4hcj6t7l/h2sOKkvnjzw4FS6
/0w0oZeYu2YuVgadM9wwPelQJ9C9Z0DFXmMdtKUGCR4xF/sVQrba/3tMlXmpYtLjfPC1
9viA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DzIuJBylROCKhx1cAfmIDbwq/q+jA9jNfXelu3GLSU4rkKDroU
D39MJeUn7DMEb3g37v+dVq0Bh9vDuf9MqX0A3UykjTNP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda+X7cjmhvRhtvOKM/cw8QV/yujznEWHdYw0jv0SRD34oxgNk4FX+oHYl6FzsBAsx3saqQOvMBUmh+0E5+MdQY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a613:: with SMTP id u19-v6mr4724954plq.234.1536797699867;
Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180909143221.21d784d02f51623e8c57c545@gentoo.org> <95a6e581-f005-99de-23ae-87a8e6014f1b@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <95a6e581-f005-99de-23ae-87a8e6014f1b@gentoo.org>
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 20:14:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=-v=8zDjWfGm=h1vTdHi1T82PCGey16DWa3HWcyVM0Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] acceptable alternatives to -Werror, was: Changing
policy about -Werror
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6b8e0907-1c13-4c8e-8e9b-6f315b2a9ec1
X-Archives-Hash: c8a99c03d862f1a99be9cbf3f8a372d9
On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:35 PM Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n
<chithanh@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>
> Requirements:
>
> * Do not fail to build/install when a warning is encountered
On a particularly critical package like a filesystem, wouldn't we want
to still fail to install when a warning is encountered?
> Also possible is to introduce FEATURES=3D"strict-warnings" or similar, wh=
ich
> will cause the build to fail if warnings are encountered in a warningfree
> ebuild.
I guess this depends on whether warningfree is only used where -Werror
would otherwise be used. Packages could presumably also warn users
when installing without this feature set not to complain too much if
our defaults destroy their data and to consider setting the flag...
:)
I get that users might quit if packages don't install, but I'm not
sure that a filesystem corruption is going to make them any happier...
--=20
Rich