From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66623-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB28113877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A99CE08BE;
	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:06:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com [209.85.220.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA80E076D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:06:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hu12so2066878vcb.20
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=/WoHFc23msJvLq9LSwqgAwvK64rQWXTwjhV2OkSuw0A=;
        b=FDs0lHKfc8XEX4dOVrny4dTvU3OM6Jr2ab9zqmzYKcfMIVTr1Xo9h2H0pxdN31EzPM
         bzm/EnU4nlDegBwMDRSZIIaciP2XdukQS1uh5JbFjV1yv/o5EON869CDbVT1pk+AMpdR
         61nHKQugYWR3Stu2lMpz7NeV1Rx/U1pDiX7WfFtwVBu4JCE6PdxNF/+uRMDL1PIbeay5
         UUSfKs3BbvXUd4H3S/Y7M1SU1YZQOxxrQrSdSW8NURskRmFboToU7PjA4xyq64MX3GJm
         /6yVtLN5HM1o6p3bRhiqBO3c9VvMdxFttxigNQVNtUs8yDGx27nMVlKfnqL9rociMiRs
         Qmlg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.49.10 with SMTP id t10mr9897684vcf.34.1405526804696;
 Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.72.19 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <21446.37158.790000.421879@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
References: <53BB07C1.8090801@gentoo.org>
	<53BC12E2.6030002@gentoo.org>
	<CA+CSuA+LJqgs1vGmq9dXbOORjttXPnS9j6tdhY1cExLBP09p0A@mail.gmail.com>
	<21446.37158.790000.421879@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:06:44 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: D2zFaZC7ykyIh1URvtscAKv23ak
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_=+UkhQjHCZUJSn5TT7Txo8h4XZENvzyOddjPdHA=DZBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites: games-fps/postal2mp-demo
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 0b093385-7efa-4f88-95fe-9940081bf457
X-Archives-Hash: b33e4e2cbb9a138fa58b016cfaf42208

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> IANAL, but there is no such concept as "abandonware" in copyright law.
> Copyright can expire, at which point the work enters into the public
> domain. However, the time for that is generally too long to play any
> practical role for software (typically 70 years post mortem auctoris).
>
> Therefore we cannot distribute a package unless it is explicitly
> allowed by its license.
>

Well, copyright law varies by jurisdiction.  However, I don't think it
really makes sense for Gentoo to pursue this for a few reasons.

Please note that I'm completely sympathetic to the cause here - I just
don't think this is a wise way to go about it.

This is legally a very risky thing to do.  If you're going to do it
you want to take advantage of countries with friendly laws, etc.
Sticking a file on every Gentoo mirror is basically the exact opposite
of that - every one of our sponsors in countries all over the world
are open to lawsuit, and those targetting us could have their pick of
jurisdiction.

Also, why combine a low-risk activity like running a distro with a
high-risk one like hosting abandonware.  There is no technical
requirement to co-mingle these activities.  Gentoo depends on lots of
servers/sponsors/etc for its core mission.  Why put all of that at
risk for something that really isn't essential to our mission?

If somebody is interested in maintaining abandonware I'd take an
entirely different approach.  It should be managed as its own upstream
project, completely independent of Gentoo or any other distro.  They
should understand the legal risks, and structure their project in a
way that minimizes them, such as by operating in countries where this
activity is legal.

Rich