From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-67073-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF301391DB
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:40:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FA19E08AF;
	Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:40:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24EA7E08AA
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id et14so12573150pad.7
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=IfJh8mSU18f33gD0uF73NpE/TIDn1ektfLnwJRy4IgQ=;
        b=YPG17spaQjRuX/STG3SMNK3Qztg1cDTvn8NV0XqSKYy8F2gDdCtYfBghulPVjLPgiG
         yFXtY0S1Ev/i9Q10JWRfGbV6y8YjTT4wExue34s551HEYmy4nc5+zb0rYC9c7F9atfYh
         JRMpzErzknz+DHsmjmJklP7TY5SPTLq6Ygj5FtLDxTXYci8w0tHp5aY9VRehu0BvG2nQ
         9yO1CPKWTClXNB8DAAWjEoLlb3oUHxxM+9B73m/yThRo0G5YV1cxPUlz5BRoTfucV6g1
         C9OTUqOF6uOEGEl6Ot1ldejiRnZd0Jquvn4W0jDOZ2DlBrHX4WKA5lV9orq/d/45O8Fr
         AF8A==
X-Received: by 10.68.201.68 with SMTP id jy4mr3286633pbc.64.1406652016103;
 Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.70.69.194 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0EP42hE9PSM=ed+2wbnT+TQEEOfbyUm9_y_ZMvxO_6qi8orQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53CFF561.90508@gentoo.org> <CAJ0EP42hE9PSM=ed+2wbnT+TQEEOfbyUm9_y_ZMvxO_6qi8orQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:39:55 +0400
Message-ID: <CAGbUWSKGvqJGrs85PmDFEVcV8TLTE5g2qmZeh=yt3yz8BEEjSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-4.8 may be needed in stable for www-client/chromium-38.x
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 1ce7af47-957e-4df8-911d-d7b0766a63da
X-Archives-Hash: 3f138f3de7e3a35854d68a5c6c8629fe

2014-07-29 20:28 GMT+04:00 Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>:
> A third option that comes from the chromium-packagers ML:
>
> 3. Download and use the pre-built clang binaries from the Chromium project.

As a proxy maintainer of a package that also utilizes C++11
extensively in late releases, I'm also rather interested in having
gcc-4.8 in stable, or, otherwise, in solution #1 from the original
mail.

I remember though when I wrote in this maillist a few months ago about
having a build dep on clang I got an impression that it would be
rather inconvenient and discouraged, though feasible.

-- 
  Georg Rudoy