From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-67276-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7929513877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3F0CE0AC8;
	Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AFEAE0AA5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 19:09:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lj1so6344192pab.19
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 12:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ZOCHViKDoIEwYgmd1ie2UruXB6Jv6AFgS9m2KU0vC+U=;
        b=K+Fzgy5x95R/AfmEMAa+raJy8y2tU3SVf/iG1JVtQp8kPBbUhrA4R/qrv21xQxG5i9
         Bdkm5GX3VFFHut92K456zKCoRYBFemhIqPKX8joUsGep/3U32QZbh0bcCzy4c+KG2but
         IMbRWo3f5PBe/DEqA2nWBt1M2X8a86HyTKc+/8VhGfmmF2kbblmXgRU7eqMQNfm9vODF
         a6NNRTNL2DhiBBwhNPHk1AmLrTQzhAPfXY5P5l+uoioLXAPmni76XDyl5PMmCFppeZSp
         Ri7OWGq71M7mckFWZlUqOwC386r4YGIFvvOmXa/EYFiZKMg5zzvvTCW/AdArBwvGS3cu
         jQKA==
X-Received: by 10.70.128.105 with SMTP id nn9mr36019406pdb.23.1408302560348;
 Sun, 17 Aug 2014 12:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.70.92.138 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 12:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB_KkxzZveXrtwvRs3qGdQ4ogAfCC_gUggCed-389uJkuj0OdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADfzvvbS7FAQ48KVjPC0eu+zQi2DOXEcneUTxeHW=NCcwuis_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB_KkxzZveXrtwvRs3qGdQ4ogAfCC_gUggCed-389uJkuj0OdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 23:09:00 +0400
Message-ID: <CAGbUWSJOkTmnUrsW4vH28wjwb8ta8paf7yFN2_QR65CoJpnb6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: acfde650-73c0-4995-8dd3-1fdc88da5cf3
X-Archives-Hash: 8ff54ff30b6ce1e0ad4d5d04ecbdf4bd

2014-08-17 22:56 GMT+04:00 Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@gentoo.org>:
> For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4
> and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to
> hearing Qt team opinion.

I second this opinion (especially after porting a few libraries'
ebuilds to multibuild to support qt5 builds).

I don't know, though, how (and whether it's possible) to automate
sed'ing the library names in qmake/cmake/whatever build system, since
you'll have to have different ones for qt4 and qt5 builds.

-- 
  Georg Rudoy