From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66203-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DC413877A
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:04:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA9DBE0AF8;
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:04:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA3DFE0AE8
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ft15so3042733pdb.2
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=oKcOqT7BHOPfWcDVb7lYpH6REexOtDwiRBOP9VAKZzM=;
b=jK89w/iSiQ7N5fRPQoC5TRqDNvsPkZB5ZZC7zZuRR7Ctj6H0iK/CaXAirFnSSyD/Cu
mwmqD00cTZ1ev5t1pIO+32JxvNDrVy4Gt4/kvNNH4kXmp/jZmF1Ew9upK03pdUy9NxF0
N5nk/yMsUm9Sjbw6ZaC2o/A+tEua2Oa/rpcaHP03aL5/eW5qnvIkXIwjecWQMh5/o+iz
PHTeucV3YWMszIvV/WN9GenEE10eGLb1maoRd3yA6WBQgtJcyAw8npdUXEx1Wpcfviwv
5c74cf4iMkc9U2Cw0aVFRsDLYqxr6OI4J9yJzAJS+xvXhtUGV8vJ/lsaSl5Etp2dhHPd
4oZQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.197.131 with SMTP id iu3mr11860776pac.102.1402761879693;
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.72.193 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.72.193 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com>
References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan>
<20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com>
<539C6B28.901@gentoo.org>
<20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 20:04:39 +0400
Message-ID: <CAGbUWSJ-QoQN8cakv3tJp6qCG6NViHzFmG0N7Onqu-8P+Ye9qw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on
any ABI changes?
From: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd908f48b2e1304fbcdf348
X-Archives-Salt: dfa5754a-9933-4420-9fbb-8359f51ab355
X-Archives-Hash: 7e2bef435e31b9492ab249f6b77f8493
--047d7bd908f48b2e1304fbcdf348
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
14 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3. 19:45 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=
=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Ciaran McCreesh" <
ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000
> hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Ciaran McCreesh:
> > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200
> > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than
> > >> necessary.
> > >
> > > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you're using the
> wrong distribution.
Gentoo always seemed to me to have different goals than just compiling for
the sake of compiling. // pure user impression
--047d7bd908f48b2e1304fbcdf348
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
14 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BD=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3. 19:45 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=
=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Ciaran McCreesh" &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com">ciaran.mccreesh@google=
mail.com</a>> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB:<br>
><br>
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000<br>
> hasufell <<a href=3D"mailto:hasufell@gentoo.org">hasufell@gentoo.or=
g</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Ciaran McCreesh:<br>
> > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200<br>
> > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <<a href=3D"mailto:mgorny@gentoo.o=
rg">mgorny@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> > >> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds tha=
n<br>
> > >> necessary.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > This shouldn't be considered to be a problem.<br>
> ><br>
> > Why not?<br>
><br>
> If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you=
9;re using the<br>
> wrong distribution.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Gentoo always seemed to me to have different goals than just=
compiling for the sake of compiling. // pure user impression<br>
</p>
--047d7bd908f48b2e1304fbcdf348--