From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SfOn7-0003Cf-BZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:09:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A280E06AF; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8B3E07A7 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbf1 with SMTP id f1so1649265vcb.40 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:08:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pBSM5C5xeST++Iub7wzIbU8EdMKJt1Zsf70rj4GReKY=; b=DSCwpcVxo4s8ADjNTgSLGXxML9TpV08IOd7UGAXpj3z7PxdBC+1ytKD3GizTUqxCgh eLR59whfUPnI1iuaRE1vX5+eExCV+MF9KpFQCkVcSXkm5eCgymZ7s7+p0DhJMCzZ5Bxc y9wy1z2OjgrywnAu7niJjikCrhaV9e+SJ4Eg/+nKeCYtIUgcSTni7nuKxdt5tqWoZXs+ 3oqteLN2Tmqlv65wlVGt3rKT7bJPA8ZRned3H9OcLApJljsF6KkT156THYE7GYj66Jj3 gbwzeIfK5UF2atZItu5GwtXiQjPMjeyovywSaZp84GYWfwDupUTpnFDTN0F8r6VZwOve No+A== Received: by 10.52.180.230 with SMTP id dr6mr1931186vdc.130.1339736926524; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.171.228 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:08:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615042810.GA9480@kroah.com> From: Matthew Finkel Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:08:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a823299142604c27bcf6d X-Archives-Salt: a2e6bc06-dff2-495d-86ae-5da715987a5c X-Archives-Hash: 8d5e59e76c231a9d60b4d15b1ce68868 --bcaec51a823299142604c27bcf6d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH wrote: > >> So, anyone been thinking about this? I have, and it's not pretty. > >> > >> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to > >> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that > I've > >> been wondering about. > > > > Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do. > > I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Microsoft > any ransom money. Last I heard Verisign was handling the signing certs, but that also doesn't mean MS isn't getting a cut of the profit. - Matt --bcaec51a823299142604c27bcf6d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Ben de Groot <= yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH <gregkh@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> So, anyone been thinking about this? =A0I have, and it's not p= retty.
>>
>> Minor details like, "do we have a = 9;company' that can pay Microsoft to
>> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical si= de that I've
>> been wondering about.
>
> Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do.

I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Micr= osoft
any ransom money.

Last I heard Verisign was= handling the signing certs, but that also doesn't mean MS isn't ge= tting a cut of the profit.=A0


- Matt
--bcaec51a823299142604c27bcf6d--