I'd like to chime in if I may.  I've found "VERIFIED" to be needless.
Especially in cases where I have logs or whatnot, having to prove the bug
is there is tedious.

Shouldn't the existence of the report be evidence enough?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > On 06/17/2016 07:05 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> >>
> >> Then everyone PLEASE stop referring to the Gentoo ebuild tree as
> >> portage.  Reserve portage for the upstream PACKAGE MANAGER.
> >
> > indeed
> >
>
> Agree, though this wasn't the sense I meant it in (in case there was
> any confusion).
>
> 1. There is the Gentoo Repo (which I always try to describe using those
> words).
>
> 2. Then there is the sys-apps/portage package in the Gentoo repo.
>
> 3.  And then there is the portage upstream that occasionally makes
> releases that end up as #2.
>
> It is between 2-3 that we need to distinguish here.
>
> I agree with the suggestion that context is sufficient already.
>
> --
> Rich
>
>