From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1220D138330 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 357E921C080; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-f174.google.com (mail-ua0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257FFE0979 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k90so184541001uak.1 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:06:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HbRSrEEZKjTqEOZIUafHeEFrcFBcwLOD4SaWQzRi8cQ=; b=NRIBgNaAlVZjvSne4RUrplSOmuSXNrNqXlcZ0wyHRCgDZFDXvKpsuDa9VuCPhUrdFF tcPpsXsjkc4i2oPbeSYI1C83AWqRmaH/FZAnVy1tdZbV1wUUKz0QJTof+erAYEGatJtp Omqu8bH50VT/xpGlwD7xxyppvzx6LWWo5zCO1bb9FQSmMUrjLJ31hogCZF+cg9G35lHq zb6h+mWUQcBGIF4R03xHGI1xyNbThJeyMajnkHRSlaIkpyC9cdbriycJpM2kkhdvXGbp fZ5YvvV9ks/CV1dx8A11OWtBW0S9sDbyXEd6+TlWO0doESjPicE5Xe/E6AGbBnZGuPlg x4Mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=HbRSrEEZKjTqEOZIUafHeEFrcFBcwLOD4SaWQzRi8cQ=; b=KrnA6dvVATNNP7OfqdEUkrz6/bHCnt2SjWutSm2VaRyXrU1MxFT9b1td+IMM0qJIBR KqvjKGp34hpYfAZYh+5q8mmQtHdMKv37PA7iSHIEPxNbB5vRnly3oat4ka7EiqzPzk+7 yXCt9YA0TMg/njg0owVZH2ww4qgFxOdBDnCOGcYQrQYtCf9Fy5R3FhVqTDpqEvyiQ3cc pj/S5hKtnB4iRx3Yp9MO36smgiuhV16K9BBPZKgcqMcz5YHpfzg2WtE86bq57bsm7eFa xqsjzReJ1qJ2YVVRDUZdKSmoSgUMZEYthSlprtn0C9mcYYiNFVRMr2SRL05C+yBkjArl NzMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOCYLy+BdH7fRxnQz+XTFJnVHWHQYjfs0Fi8h7z2mG4VQzWId7mTFY91aQ7t5NvgvI/WDVN7qa0kSqhNg== X-Received: by 10.159.55.199 with SMTP id q65mr5479074uaq.12.1472313974217; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.178.71 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:05:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1471881656.31785.109.camel@gentoo.org> References: <1471881656.31785.109.camel@gentoo.org> From: Raymond Jennings Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:05:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Arch Testers To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c04c9a66e5e8f053b0fcfb7 X-Archives-Salt: bb6b7d28-c67d-47c2-951e-33eeb8362947 X-Archives-Hash: da61bd800ce333a5d770dc82ffba1779 --94eb2c04c9a66e5e8f053b0fcfb7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > I am not sure when https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Arch_Testers wa > s created, but it's empty and unused for a long time, hence, I don't > know if anyone would be willing to join to it (I am unsure about what > will it cover over the "dedicated" arch tester teams) or it should be > removed simply :/ > > Thanks > Does this project presently contain the various arch teams, like amd64 and x86 and sparc etc? If so, imho it is not really empty, but serves as a superproject much like desktop does, possibly manageable in the same way. And if not the project name is misleading anyway. Come to think of it, does existing policy cover how to handle "superprojects" that serve as nothing but umbrellas for collections of other projects and have no tasks or members of their owns? --94eb2c04c9a66e5e8f053b0fcfb7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Aug 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> w= rote:
I am not sure wh= en=C2=A0https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project= :Arch_Testers=C2=A0wa
s created, but it's empty and unused for a long time, hence, I don'= t
know if anyone would be willing to join to it (I am unsure about what
will it cover over the "dedicated" arch tester teams) or it shoul= d be
removed simply :/

Thanks
=C2=A0
Does this project presently c= ontain the various arch teams, like amd64 and x86 and sparc etc?

If so, imho it i= s not really empty, but serves as a superproject much like desktop does, po= ssibly manageable in the same way.

And = if not the project name is misleading anyway.

Come to think of it, does existing po= licy cover how to handle "superprojects" that serve as nothing bu= t umbrellas for collections of other projects and have no tasks or members = of their owns?
--94eb2c04c9a66e5e8f053b0fcfb7--