How about simply closing sunrise to new packages, and migrate them to elsewhere as resources permit? Just plugging the spigot and deprecating it would improve things. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:44:42AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Your thoughts? > > I would agree that proxy-maint and GH pull requests are better than > > sunrise, and so we should probably sunset (pun intended) the latter. > The new method is better, but that doesn't cover what to do with the > 500+ packages in sunrise. > > I have found them useful in the past, when I suddenly had a need for > something, and there was an ebuild in sunrise that I could adopt into > the tree. > > -- > Robin Hugh Johnson > Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer > E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 > GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 > >