From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80297-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F43B139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7822E0DF3;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53332E0DE4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i5so77637287pfc.2
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 01:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=PxwGFU9DcI+o19id3IIGdFZizSWE/MZQ50PusombY3w=;
        b=OAB7RuPTdcTR9VHnJWXCwBH4yyS+Yhr8qJkMT6jmLf3ehXicjnh5LI6aViWvwErZCp
         FLB6vYykegMZYnpQK+9qqGsemBCRe0u9M6WjdkjvlPY9zdEsT6Y7IRnH/LxDmG4ZonI7
         Nl1XUF7biTUqb2iAKUx86gWBs92OkEpLXt/d1eQ9dl1IqL3ztnIErqBaD9wTTLasawFj
         H54Wc8hXzSxPrD0qjei70O1LuZ59ubS083eA4Ps3KmZH2oGhAZEsaXSbYfZolXV+Rk7g
         RL1IYn0p8w2TY4zYqYtq6RfRxR+IZUJZww4Oc+fsQQ35C6U3jQxx3hGSvLG7c2j1MMsu
         8t1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=PxwGFU9DcI+o19id3IIGdFZizSWE/MZQ50PusombY3w=;
        b=JAkAKi9j+v1cmXtyKKDkbf5dU5qtqVtr5shZxN175tgBI1DRIojmSj/ue/X87nGva6
         d3V4C3MMs3Ov9qxp0yBDtJxowf85B2515Xn39f0pSDZI7cC0V4k0WVn/GmFXko3Ux5cs
         1RNOuM1lV05h0JqlMipcKyu/bHj1SjsGbHEpyabIvzrj46gYjQB04KxEGacc1cSKhrJs
         KbS5bWxtNSKT7jLTQxRipBnepNifRfRt01qKeWsnTjYSk9S4+d7Xi70V136efT4TAdZL
         9coc7SMjP4ZaoRadHWa057OTTNzJd9BxlZdNFMmci747cT7uuk1DYz1+cUyZ+9nQvwDb
         pHmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5Wzv4UVoOm/uRK6vQ5/KToZJAcrXzXhJ1q61ueTpaIRNf1Jykb
	576P2D6YJ0i+uAnkb0q1EEgTi9Wd8AYI
X-Received: by 10.99.125.73 with SMTP id m9mr16971002pgn.234.1492504625025;
 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 01:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.135.8 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 01:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <od4i5u$h86$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <od4i5u$h86$1@blaine.gmane.org>
From: Tomas Mozes <hydrapolic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:37:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG6MAzSUqBS-qzRmETT3u48B=KXBQ0KjMQPqXLO=JDBmKjiv+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ??
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045da6360018d0054d6cd0cf
X-Archives-Salt: 62a98cf6-da34-4047-854e-c25ceaf63cd4
X-Archives-Hash: bbbe195d4e4b6981d0d6eea86eda3334

--f403045da6360018d0054d6cd0cf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible <
joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=3D1
>
> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for me.
> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because the=
re
> seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one unstable:
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
>
> Can someone shed some light on this?
>
> Cheers,
> J=C3=B6rg
>
>
>
On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is probably
related to:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D612178

--f403045da6360018d0054d6cd0cf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com" target=3D"_blank">joe=
rg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204=
,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:<br>
<a href=3D"https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?show=
msg=3D1" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://gitweb.gentoo.org/<wb=
r>repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/<wbr>gcc?showmsg=3D1</a><br>
<br>
However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for me.<br=
>
Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because there=
<br>
seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one unstable:<br=
>
<a href=3D"https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc" rel=3D"noref=
errer" target=3D"_blank">https://packages.gentoo.org/<wbr>packages/sys-deve=
l/gcc</a><br>
<br>
Can someone shed some light on this?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
J=C3=B6rg<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>On which platform do you have it unsta=
ble? The packages problem is probably related to:<br><a href=3D"https://bug=
s.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D612178">https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi=
?id=3D612178</a> <br></div></div><br></div></div>

--f403045da6360018d0054d6cd0cf--