From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80308-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D5C139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:41:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E5AFE0E38;
	Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B209DE0CD0
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:41:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 194so42710835pfv.3
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=AaTaBU56NNCQ7LqaKLv0GTd/pQdjObjadLBasoVSMcw=;
        b=iC4tLSbTUG8Ai1PVocgC794rnzdURFOEWhX4Agu3UMh1DS/sR82ig5clshzrBwkKnv
         tDFavkwsmB7omyBI47beNVmE8VRIjqKjjj2DvSLuYq7qADscOYZDmlKgriMDmMg+0hNh
         RWcw+Blq3TGl1enLxp+mXP3tmiaj+DPrlcHV5DvVMs3T2OGjbVNLTFbTCjrdedfdzPJ9
         /ubvr8IKOBzIxEwp5qQnSXyiRZlhPM9lj9dmfR0RcMaEE+EU48nktufa5IWKqytUP747
         pMAHZWeN4tDUkGCr6RJ4O1zjPJPaHW7fBhqmsOBPXK5ga9EtfWrHhpIPhgzUfE0XJ/LG
         KPTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=AaTaBU56NNCQ7LqaKLv0GTd/pQdjObjadLBasoVSMcw=;
        b=AdiMnbvkl45O+DQNScybK4fJnkjRL3RRkq+cQhm2D2/FVG9efmCirJqsJVVt3yNjed
         CAzfoeVh7OyxmatOtb9RtlUThet68ZymJtaeXwO7bziuInSu5trWpwwjnIsfQQ8QIkB5
         ZVyyagNPoUnaRLoi68BNtUjmo0RiYOevXZDuwrP6vMxzEmFlrBWIwaRwaHkprRv1R2Le
         1neZM9L4gLvKyEsfaSAIhnnZplGOu6eTn/TUrCcn3lTZtI53UNGCD9tytTgkb7ZodvMB
         LDKqELNx1BCPwhXkZKnHwIZvtocjvl8rXGdThTAHlX5qYVmI2sZgPa2oLI7K6O2lG0GE
         y26g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5cQ0gvRpbKMidTtxCtddu//Lc6yJf1UHohyX9pcVSNbybv82ua
	2wWPnG9vX2ZHQfJ2PnojDx2+Xs4q9g==
X-Received: by 10.84.196.164 with SMTP id l33mr24093376pld.0.1492526493743;
 Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.135.8 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <od4i5u$h86$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <od4i5u$h86$1@blaine.gmane.org>
From: Tomas Mozes <hydrapolic@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:41:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG6MAzST+qBeN9m2UOFgCaLXUSPR6wP=nBJVmYDvATO8w7igzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stable gcc 5.4.0 ??
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c188adc7a3fc5054d71e77e
X-Archives-Salt: 391ad436-0347-41ee-8a46-3887bd5856dc
X-Archives-Hash: 97aebfc1cfc9b6d91e988e4653c6518b

--94eb2c188adc7a3fc5054d71e77e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible <
joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=3D1
>
> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for me.
> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because the=
re
> seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one unstable:
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
>
> Can someone shed some light on this?
>
> Cheers,
> J=C3=B6rg
>
>
>
You did mean 5.4.0-r3, right?

--94eb2c188adc7a3fc5054d71e77e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible <span dir=3D"ltr">=
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com" target=3D"_blank">joe=
rg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"g=
mail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-l=
eft:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:<br>
<a href=3D"https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?show=
msg=3D1" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://gitweb.gentoo.org/<wb=
r>repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/<wbr>gcc?showmsg=3D1</a><br>
<br>
However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for me.<br=
>
Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because there=
<br>
seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one unstable:<br=
>
<a href=3D"https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc" rel=3D"noref=
errer" target=3D"_blank">https://packages.gentoo.org/<wbr>packages/sys-deve=
l/gcc</a><br>
<br>
Can someone shed some light on this?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
J=C3=B6rg<br>
<br>
<br></blockquote><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote">You did mean 5.4.0-r3=
, right? <br></div><br></div></div>

--94eb2c188adc7a3fc5054d71e77e--